Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9008
Title: | Assessment of lidar depolarization uncertainty by means of a polarimetric lidar simulator | Authors: | Bravo-Aranda, Juan Antonio Belegante, Livio Freudenthaler, Volker Alados-Arboledas, Lucas Nicolae, Doina Nicoleta Granados-Munõz, María José Luis Guerrero-Rascado, J. L. Amodeo, Aldo D'Amico, Giusseppe Engelmann, R. Pappalardo, Gelsomina Kokkalis, Panayotis Mamouri, Rodanthi-Elisavet Papayannis, Alexandros D. Navas-Guzmán, Francisco José Olmo, Francisco Wandinger, Ulla Amato, Francesco Haeffelin, Martial |
Major Field of Science: | Engineering and Technology | Field Category: | Civil Engineering | Keywords: | Depolarization measurements;Spherical and non-spherical aerosol | Issue Date: | 7-Oct-2016 | Source: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2016, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 4935-4953 | Volume: | 9 | Issue: | 10 | Start page: | 4935 | End page: | 4953 | Project: | ACTRIS PPP - Aerosols, Clouds and Trace gases Preparatory Phase Project | Journal: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | Abstract: | Lidar depolarization measurements distinguish between spherical and non-spherical aerosol particles based on the change of the polarization state between the emitted and received signal. The particle shape information in combination with other aerosol optical properties allows the characterization of different aerosol types and the retrieval of aerosol particle microphysical properties. Regarding the microphysical inversions, the lidar depolarization technique is becoming a key method since particle shape information can be used by algorithms based on spheres and spheroids, optimizing the retrieval procedure. Thus, the identification of the depolarization error sources and the quantification of their effects are crucial. This work presents a new tool to assess the systematic error of the volume linear depolarization ratio (δ), combining the Stokes-Müller formalism and the complete sampling of the error space using the lidar model presented in Freudenthaler (2016a). This tool is applied to a synthetic lidar system and to several EARLINET lidars with depolarization capabilities at 355 or 532 nm. The lidar systems show relative errors of δ larger than 100% for δ values around molecular linear depolarization ratios (∼ 0.004 and up to ∼ 10 % for δ = 0.45). However, one system shows only relative errors of 25 and 0.22% for δ = 0.004 and δ = 0.45, respectively, and gives an example of how a proper identification and reduction of the main error sources can drastically reduce the systematic errors of δ. In this regard, we provide some indications of how to reduce the systematic errors. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9008 | ISSN: | 18678548 | DOI: | 10.5194/amt-9-4935-2016 | Rights: | © Copernicus | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research (IISTA-CEAMA) University of Granada École Polytechnique National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Meteorologisches Institut CNR - National Research Council of Italy Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research National Technical University Of Athens Cyprus University of Technology University of Bern |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mamouri.pdf | Open access | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
34
checked on Nov 9, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
31
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s) 20
517
Last Week
0
0
Last month
4
4
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Download(s)
189
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.