Corporate Social Performance, Legitimacy, and the Choice of Foreign Partners by State‐Controlled Entities in the Global Extractive Industries
Date Issued
September 8, 2023
Author(s)
Abstract
Partner selection in IJVs is an important but understudied phenomenon, especially when
viewed from
the perspective of the host country partner involved (Nippa and Reuer, 2019; Sun et al., 2021a). Contrary
to the existing research’s assumption that international strategy decisions reflect the interests of MNEs,
other organizations’ interests may be equally salient (Nippa and Reuer, 2019). Understanding the
perspective of the host partner, the focus of this paper, is critical because, often, it is this local actor that
initiates the search for foreign partners (Shi et al., 2014), or it can domi nate the partnership due to
location specific advantages (Erramilli et al., 1997). Also, the value of nonmarket strategies, including
managing CSP, aimed to give MNEs a foothold in the country (Sun et al., 2021b) hinges on the local
partners’ perceptions.
The host country partner perspective is especially salient when the local state is that partner and when
one considers SCEs’ significant involvement in partnerships with MNEs (Sun et al., 2021a). SCEs often
dominate their focal industries, exhibit unique i nstitutional logics, and play a mixed role as regulators,
commercial enterprises, and social contributors. Importantly, they are unique in how their sociopolitical legitimacy is formed. This uniqueness stems mostly from the social contract between the stat
e and the
local society and from the state’s distinct salient sociopolitical stakeholders.
The sociopolitical legitimacy of the state and its actors has significant implications for the success of
the state’s economic exchanges with foreign MNEs. We draw on neo institutional theory (Kostova and
Zaheer, 1999) and argue that in selecting an IJV partner, in addition to using other important task or
partner related selection criteria, an SCE will evaluate partner characteristics that help enhance its
legitima cy, that of the IJV, and ultimately that of the state in the eyes of salient stakeholders. One such
characteristic is, as we posit, a candidate foreign partner’s CSP. We consider the legitimation
mechanisms bolstered by CSP and explain how particular insti tutional factors in the foreign country, the
host country, and supranationally interact with them, influencing CSP’s importance as a selection
criterion.
The context of our study is the global extractive industries. They are a crucial wealth
creating instr ument
for resource rich countries, which often rely on foreign partners to exploit resources. Because of the
often disruptive effects of these industries’ activities on communities and the natural environment and
local and international sociopolitical stak eholders’ scrutiny, the foreign partner’s CSP, the legitimacy of
the IJV, and ultimately that of the SCE and the state may determine partnership success. We test our
hypotheses using a sample of IJVs between SCEs from 48 countries and 203 foreign partners from 22
countries between 2000 2015.
Our findings suggest that an MNE’s CSP can be an attractive selection criterion for an SCE because of
its legitimacy effects. The SCE’s evaluation of CSP as legitimacy enhancing is influenced by the level
of corruption in the MNE’s home country, the legiti macy of the host state, and the number of neighboring
countries participating in international multi stakeholder initiatives. Our examination represents the
first, to our knowledge, attempt to study the host state’s perspective in forming partnerships with foreign
MNEs, considering MNEs’ CSP as a selection criterion, and showing how nonmarket strategy interacts
with institutional elements at the host, home, and supranational levels.
viewed from
the perspective of the host country partner involved (Nippa and Reuer, 2019; Sun et al., 2021a). Contrary
to the existing research’s assumption that international strategy decisions reflect the interests of MNEs,
other organizations’ interests may be equally salient (Nippa and Reuer, 2019). Understanding the
perspective of the host partner, the focus of this paper, is critical because, often, it is this local actor that
initiates the search for foreign partners (Shi et al., 2014), or it can domi nate the partnership due to
location specific advantages (Erramilli et al., 1997). Also, the value of nonmarket strategies, including
managing CSP, aimed to give MNEs a foothold in the country (Sun et al., 2021b) hinges on the local
partners’ perceptions.
The host country partner perspective is especially salient when the local state is that partner and when
one considers SCEs’ significant involvement in partnerships with MNEs (Sun et al., 2021a). SCEs often
dominate their focal industries, exhibit unique i nstitutional logics, and play a mixed role as regulators,
commercial enterprises, and social contributors. Importantly, they are unique in how their sociopolitical legitimacy is formed. This uniqueness stems mostly from the social contract between the stat
e and the
local society and from the state’s distinct salient sociopolitical stakeholders.
The sociopolitical legitimacy of the state and its actors has significant implications for the success of
the state’s economic exchanges with foreign MNEs. We draw on neo institutional theory (Kostova and
Zaheer, 1999) and argue that in selecting an IJV partner, in addition to using other important task or
partner related selection criteria, an SCE will evaluate partner characteristics that help enhance its
legitima cy, that of the IJV, and ultimately that of the state in the eyes of salient stakeholders. One such
characteristic is, as we posit, a candidate foreign partner’s CSP. We consider the legitimation
mechanisms bolstered by CSP and explain how particular insti tutional factors in the foreign country, the
host country, and supranationally interact with them, influencing CSP’s importance as a selection
criterion.
The context of our study is the global extractive industries. They are a crucial wealth
creating instr ument
for resource rich countries, which often rely on foreign partners to exploit resources. Because of the
often disruptive effects of these industries’ activities on communities and the natural environment and
local and international sociopolitical stak eholders’ scrutiny, the foreign partner’s CSP, the legitimacy of
the IJV, and ultimately that of the SCE and the state may determine partnership success. We test our
hypotheses using a sample of IJVs between SCEs from 48 countries and 203 foreign partners from 22
countries between 2000 2015.
Our findings suggest that an MNE’s CSP can be an attractive selection criterion for an SCE because of
its legitimacy effects. The SCE’s evaluation of CSP as legitimacy enhancing is influenced by the level
of corruption in the MNE’s home country, the legiti macy of the host state, and the number of neighboring
countries participating in international multi stakeholder initiatives. Our examination represents the
first, to our knowledge, attempt to study the host state’s perspective in forming partnerships with foreign
MNEs, considering MNEs’ CSP as a selection criterion, and showing how nonmarket strategy interacts
with institutional elements at the host, home, and supranational levels.
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
Symeou.pdf
Size
145.38 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
c3e16c6709c6fae2ec5970aec9949beb