Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/34915
Title: A mathematical framework for underground hydrogen storage in reservoirs with geo-methanation and enhanced gas recovery
Authors: Konstantinou, Charalampos 
Giakoumi, Matheos 
Angastiniotis, Nicos 
Papanastasiou, Panos 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Mechanical Engineering
Keywords: Hydrogen volume estimations;Geo-methanation;Gibbs minimization method;Advection;Piston-like injection
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2025
Source: Energy Conversion and Management, 2025, vol.345
Volume: 345
Journal: Energy Conversion and Management 
Abstract: This study introduces a mathematical framework for estimating the performance of underground hydrogen storage operations, considering hydrogen injection into a depleted reservoir, co-injection of hydrogen and CO<inf>2</inf> for geo-methanation, and hydrogen injection for enhanced gas recovery through an approximate piston-like displacement. The model integrates the material balance equation, various equations of state (EoS), advection-driven gas mixing, a water influx model and Gibbs energy minimization method. Results of a parametric study for a reference reservoir show that increasing initial reservoir pressure from 2000 to 5000 psi improves storage efficiency from 22 % to 42 %, and raises natural gas recovery from 60 % to 87 %. Higher temperature reduces injected hydrogen volumes due to gas expansion, while production rates above 500 MMSCF/day suppress water influx, increasing available pore space for storage. At high salinity, hydrogen solubility decreases, reducing storage efficiency by up to 12 %. Piston-like injection at a 1:8 H<inf>2</inf>/NG ratio leads to hydrogen storage volumes of 40–80 BSCF, compared to 20–40 BSCF for the 1:16 case, with storage efficiencies of 8–11 % and 4–6 %, respectively. Dissolved hydrogen remains minimal (≤1.2 BSCF), confirming the dominance of free gas storage. The hydrogen drive index reaches up to 16 % in piston-like scenarios, supplementing natural gas expansion and delaying water influx. No hydrogen breakthrough is observed. Differences of up to 63 BSCF in storage estimates between EoS at high pressure highlight the importance of thermodynamic model selection. Applied to the Frigg Field, the framework confirms suitability for large-scale hydrogen storage and recovery under diverse operational conditions.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/34915
ISSN: 01968904
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120328
Type: Article
Affiliation : University of Cyprus 
PHAETHON Centre of Excellence for Intelligent, Efficient and Sustainable Energy Solutions 
Technologies for the Energy Transition, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 
University of Texas 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

Page view(s)

360
Last Week
2
Last month
31
checked on Nov 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.