Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3440
Title: A Framework for Scaffolding Students’ Assessment of the Credibility of Evidence
Authors: Iolie Nicolaidou 
Terzian, Frederiki 
Hadjichambis, Andreas Ch. 
Kafouris, Dimitris 
Kyza, Eleni A. 
Major Field of Science: Social Sciences
Field Category: Educational Sciences
Keywords: Evidence credibility assessment;Scaffolding;Biotechnology;Reflective inquiry;High school students;Collaboration;Socio-scientific issues;WWW
Issue Date: Sep-2011
Source: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, vol. 48, no.7, pp. 711-744
Volume: 48
Issue: 7
Start page: 711
End page: 744
Project: Digital support for Inquiry, Collaboration, and Reflection on Socio-Scientific Debates 
Journal: Journal of Research in Science Teaching 
Abstract: Assessing the credibility of evidence in complex, socio-scientific problems is of paramount importance. However, there is little discussion in the science education literature on this topic and on how students can be supported in developing such skills. In this article, we describe an instructional design framework, which we call the Credibility Assessment Framework, to scaffold high school students’ collaborative construction of evidence-based decisions and their assessment of the credibility of evidence. The framework was employed for the design of a web-based reflective inquiry environment on a socioscientific issue, and was enacted with 11th grade students. The article describes the components of the Credibility Assessment Framework and provides the details and results of an empirical study illustrating this framework in practice. The results are presented in the form of a case study of how 11th grade students investigated and evaluated scientific data relating to the cultivation of genetically modified plants. Multiple kinds of data were collected, including pre- and post-tests of students’ conceptual understanding and their skills in assessing the credibility of evidence, and videotapes of students’ collaborative inquiry sessions. The analysis of the pre- and post-tests on students’ conceptual understanding of Biotechnology and their skills in assessing the credibility of evidence revealed statistically significant learning gains. Students’ work in task-related artifacts and the analysis of two groups’ videotaped discussions showed that students became sensitive to credibility criteria, questioned the sources of data and correctly identified sources of low, moderate, and high credibility. Implications for designers and educators regarding the application of this framework are discussed.
Description: FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2007-1 Title: Digital support for Inquiry, Collaboration, and Reflection on Socio-Scientific Debates
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3440
ISSN: 10982736
Other Identifiers: http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/jspui/handle/10488/3248
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20420
Rights: © Wiley
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cyprus Ministry of Education and Culture 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

492
Last Week
0
Last month
7
checked on Dec 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.