Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3440
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIolie Nicolaidou-
dc.contributor.authorTerzian, Frederiki-
dc.contributor.authorHadjichambis, Andreas Ch.-
dc.contributor.authorKafouris, Dimitris-
dc.contributor.authorKyza, Eleni A.-
dc.date2011-09-01-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-22T10:17:13Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T09:13:52Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-22T10:17:13Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T09:13:52Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-
dc.identifierhttp://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/jspui/handle/10488/3248-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, vol. 48, no.7, pp. 711-744en_US
dc.identifier.issn10982736-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3440-
dc.descriptionFP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2007-1 Title: Digital support for Inquiry, Collaboration, and Reflection on Socio-Scientific Debatesen_US
dc.description.abstractAssessing the credibility of evidence in complex, socio-scientific problems is of paramount importance. However, there is little discussion in the science education literature on this topic and on how students can be supported in developing such skills. In this article, we describe an instructional design framework, which we call the Credibility Assessment Framework, to scaffold high school students’ collaborative construction of evidence-based decisions and their assessment of the credibility of evidence. The framework was employed for the design of a web-based reflective inquiry environment on a socioscientific issue, and was enacted with 11th grade students. The article describes the components of the Credibility Assessment Framework and provides the details and results of an empirical study illustrating this framework in practice. The results are presented in the form of a case study of how 11th grade students investigated and evaluated scientific data relating to the cultivation of genetically modified plants. Multiple kinds of data were collected, including pre- and post-tests of students’ conceptual understanding and their skills in assessing the credibility of evidence, and videotapes of students’ collaborative inquiry sessions. The analysis of the pre- and post-tests on students’ conceptual understanding of Biotechnology and their skills in assessing the credibility of evidence revealed statistically significant learning gains. Students’ work in task-related artifacts and the analysis of two groups’ videotaped discussions showed that students became sensitive to credibility criteria, questioned the sources of data and correctly identified sources of low, moderate, and high credibility. Implications for designers and educators regarding the application of this framework are discussed.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relationDigital support for Inquiry, Collaboration, and Reflection on Socio-Scientific Debatesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Research in Science Teachingen_US
dc.rights© Wileyen_US
dc.subjectEvidence credibility assessmenten_US
dc.subjectScaffoldingen_US
dc.subjectBiotechnologyen_US
dc.subjectReflective inquiryen_US
dc.subjectHigh school studentsen_US
dc.subjectCollaborationen_US
dc.subjectSocio-scientific issuesen_US
dc.subjectWWWen_US
dc.titleA Framework for Scaffolding Students’ Assessment of the Credibility of Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Ministry of Education and Cultureen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEducational Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.20420en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/100en
dc.relation.issue7en_US
dc.relation.volume48en_US
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
dc.identifier.spage711en_US
dc.identifier.epage744en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1098-2736-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.project.grantnoCoREFLECT-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8267-0328-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0992-4034-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

440
Last Week
1
Last month
14
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.