Repository logoCyprus University of Technology
Log In(current)
Ελληνικά
English
  1. Home
  2. Cyprus University of Technology (Research Output)
  3. Άρθρα/Articles
  4. The Effect of Different Molar Access Cavity Designs on Root Canal Shaping Times Using Rotation and Reciprocation Instruments in Mandibular First Molars
  • Details

The Effect of Different Molar Access Cavity Designs on Root Canal Shaping Times Using Rotation and Reciprocation Instruments in Mandibular First Molars

Journal
Journal of Endodontics
Date Issued
July 1, 2022
Author(s)
Vorster, Martin  
van der Vyver, Peet J.  
Markou, George  
DOI
10.1016/j.joen.2022.03.011
Abstract
Introduction: The aim was to compare the glide path and final preparation times of WaveOne Gold and TruNatomy in conjunction with two different endodontic access cavity designs in extracted human molar teeth. Methods: 60 extracted human mandibular molars with mesiobuccal canals were selected and randomly divided into two different access cavity design preparation groups (n = 30). Traditional access cavities (TAC) and conservative access cavities (CAC). Within each cavity design group, the 30 teeth were divided in to two instrumentation groups (WaveOne Gold Primary (n = 15) and TruNatomy Prime (n = 15)). Group 1: TAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by WaveOne Gold Glider and WaveOne Gold Primary. Group 2: CAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by WaveOne Gold Glider and WaveOne Gold Primary. Group 3: TAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by TruNatomy Orifice Modifier and Glider and TruNatomy Prime. Group 4: CAC, #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by TruNatomy Glider and TruNatomy Prime. Glide path and final preparation times were recorded. Results: Shaping time with TruNatomy Glider in combination with TruNatomy Prime instruments were faster compared to the WaveOne Gold Glider/ WaveOne Gold Primary instruments regardless of the type of access cavity preparation. TAC design yielded faster preparation time (38.2 ± 4.57 seconds) compared to the CAC (55.6 ± 6.91 seconds) in the WaveOne Gold Glider/ WaveOne Gold Primary instrumentation group. No difference was found between the different access cavity design groups in combination with TruNatomy Glider/TruNatomy Prime preparation. Conclusion: Preparation time with TruNatomy Glider and Prime instruments was significantly faster than WaveOne Gold Glider/WaveOne Gold Primary, regardless of the access cavity design. TAC design in combination with WaveOne Gold Glider/ WaveOne Gold Primary instrumentation resulted in faster preparation time compared to WaveOne Gold Glider/WaveOne Gold in combination with the CAC design.
Subjects

Canal preparation tim...

Explore by
  • Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Faculty & Departments
  • Theses
  • Patents
  • Projects
  • Journals
  • Conferences
Useful Links
  • Researcher Portfolio Guide
  • Researcher Profile
  • Create an ORCID ID
  • CUT Open Access Author Fund
  • ETDS Guide
Copyright Policies

Use Sherpa/Romeo to find publisher copyright policies

Go
Go
  • SPARC Author Addendum Engine
  • National Open Access Policy in Cyprus
Deposit your work to Ktisis
  • Self-archiving. Please sign in to Ktisis.
  • Email your work to:
    library.dspace@cut.ac.cy
  • Contact your subject librarian

Member of

OpenAIREre3dataOpenDOARCOREDART
Cyprus University of Technology
Library and
Information
Services

Copyright © 2022 - Library and Information Services Feedback - Built with DSpace-CRIS - 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
COAR NotifyCOAR Notify