Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Delphi survey on the most promising areas and methods to improve systematic reviews' production and updating
Authors: Mahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha 
Tomić, Vicko 
Ellen, Moriah 
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara 
Sfetcu, Raluca 
Baladia, Eduard 
Riva, Nicoletta 
Kassianos, Angelos P. 
Marušić, Ana 
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: Health Sciences
Keywords: Automation tools;Evidence syntesis;Prioritization
Issue Date: 28-Mar-2023
Source: Systematic Reviews, 2023, vol. 12, iss. 1
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Journal: Systematic Reviews 
Abstract: Systematic reviews (SRs) are invaluable evidence syntheses, widely used in biomedicine and other scientific areas. Tremendous resources are being spent on the production and updating of SRs. There is a continuous need to automatize the process and use the workforce and resources to make it faster and more efficient.
ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02223-3
Rights: © The Author(s)
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cantonal Hospital Zenica 
Sarajevo School of Science and Technology 
University of Split School of Medicine 
Ben Gurion University of the Negev 
University of Toronto 
Danube University Krems 
Spiru Haret University 
Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética 
National School of Public Health 
University of Malta 
University College London 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
kassianos 3.pdfFull text1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

Citations 50

checked on Feb 2, 2024

Page view(s) 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Feb 26, 2024

Download(s) 50

checked on Feb 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons