Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29668
Title: A Narrative Review on the Collection and Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Survivorship Care with Emphasis on Symptom Monitoring
Authors: Van Den Hurk, Corina J.G. 
Mols, Floortje 
Eicher, Manuela 
Chan, Raymond J. 
Becker, Annemarie 
Geleijnse, Gijs 
Walraven, Iris 
Coolbrandt, Annemarie 
Lustberg, Maryam 
Velikova, Galina 
Charalambous, Andreas 
Koczwara, Bogda 
Howell, Doris 
Basch, Ethan M 
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V 
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
Keywords: Cancer;eHealth;Survivorship;Electronic patient-reported outcomes;Symptoms;Quality of care;Quality of life;Self-management;Ethics
Issue Date: 17-Jun-2022
Source: Current Oncology, 2022, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 4370-4385
Volume: 29
Issue: 6
Start page: 4370
End page: 4385
Journal: Current oncology 
Abstract: Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) applications promise great added value for improving symptom management and health-related quality of life. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the collection and use of ePROs for cancer survivorship care, with an emphasis on ePRO-symptom monitoring. It offers many different perspectives from research settings, while current implementation in routine care is ongoing. ePRO collection optimizes survivorship care by providing insight into the patients' well-being and prioritizing their unmet needs during the whole trajectory from diagnosis to end-of-life. ePRO-symptom monitoring can contribute to timely health risk detection and subsequently allow earlier intervention. Detection is optimized by automatically generated alerts that vary from simple to complex and multilayered. Using ePRO-symptoms during in-hospital consultation enhances the patients' conversation with the health care provider before making informed decisions about treatments, other interventions, or self-management. ePRO(-symptoms) entail specific implementation issues and complementary ethics considerations. The latter is due to privacy concerns, digital divide, and scarcity of adequately representative data for particular groups of patients.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29668
ISSN: 17187729
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060349
Rights: © by the authors.
Type: Article
Affiliation : Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL) 
Tilburg University 
Lausanne University Hospital 
Flinders University 
Cancer Center Amsterdam 
Radboud university medical center 
University Hospitals Leuven 
Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery 
Yale School of Medicine 
Breast Center at Smilow Cancer Hospital 
St James’s University Hospital 
Cyprus University of Technology 
University of Turku 
University of Toronto 
University of North Carolina Cancer Center 
Netherlands Cancer Institute 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
curroncol-29-00349-v2 (1).pdf312.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Nov 1, 2023

Page view(s)

180
Last Week
2
Last month
4
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Download(s) 50

68
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons