Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23987
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWingen, Tobias-
dc.contributor.authorEnglich, Birte-
dc.contributor.authorEstal-Muñoz, Víctor-
dc.contributor.authorMareva, Silvana-
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-12T15:54:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-12T15:54:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Research in Quality of Life, 2021, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1983–1998en_US
dc.identifier.issn18712584-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23987-
dc.description.abstractWhy does social class affect Quality of Life? We simultaneously investigated two novel possible explanations: Because a high social class is associated with increased control over resources (i.e., power) or because a high social class is associated with higher respect and esteem in the eyes of others (i.e., status). To test these explanations, we collected data from 384 US-based individuals. We measured their social class, power, status, and four facets of Quality of Life (physical, mental, social, and environmental). For each facet, we calculated the correlation with social class. Next, we tested whether the relationship between social class and the specific facet was mediated by power, status, or both. Social class correlated significantly with all facets of Quality of Life (physical, mental, social, and environmental). Using parallel mediation models, we found that this positive relationship was mediated by status, but not by power. For some facets of Quality of Life (physical, environmental), power even had a negative indirect effect. These results suggest that upper-class individuals indeed have a higher Quality of Life. However, this seems to be mostly due to the increased status of upper-class individuals, whereas power was less important or even had detrimental effects on Quality of Life. Researchers and policymakers aiming to address class-based Quality of Life inequality could thus benefit from focusing on status as an important mediator. Moreover, our work demonstrates the importance of considering power and status as distinct constructs, in order to fully unravel the relationship between social class and Quality of Life.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Research in Quality of Lifeen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectInequalityen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectSocial classen_US
dc.subjectStatusen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.titleExploring the Relationship between Social Class and Quality of Life: the Mediating Role of Power and Statusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cologneen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Madriden_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cambridgeen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.subject.categorySociologyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11482-020-09853-yen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087842913-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85087842913-
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume16en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage1983en_US
dc.identifier.epage1998en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1871-2584-
crisitem.journal.publisherSpringer Nature-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Wingen2021_Article_ExploringTheRelationshipBetwee.pdfFulltext464.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
11482_2020_9853_MOESM1_ESM.pdfSupplement370.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

231
Last Week
0
Last month
4
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Download(s)

210
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons