Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23261
Title: Ethics in tendering: A survey of Australian opinion and practice
Authors: Ray, Richard S. 
Hornibrook, John 
Skitmore, Martin 
Zarkada, Anna K. 
Major Field of Science: Social Sciences
Field Category: Economics and Business
Keywords: Ethics;Tendering;Codes;Restrictive practices
Issue Date: 1999
Source: Construction Management and Economics, 1999, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139-153
Volume: 17
Issue: 2
Start page: 139
End page: 153
Journal: Construction Management and Economics 
Abstract: The main issues in the philosophical foundations of ethics and tendering ethics are outlined, and an introduction is provided to the Australian codes of tendering practice. A questionnaire survey is then described which sought to ascertain the extent to which ethical behaviour in tendering is supported and practiced in Australia. The results of the survey indicate that most companies support the use of codes of tendering; defend the right of withdrawal of tenders; disapprove of bid shopping, cover pricing and union involvement in the tendering process, and support the principals' right to know what is included in a tender as well as the self-regulation of the tendering codes. It is also shown that most companies have developed, and follow, idiosyncratic ethical guidelines that are independent of, and often contrary to, the nationally prescribed codes. The conclusions recommend a need for the development of a theoretical frame of reference that can be tested through a more detailed empirical approach to the development of future ethical prescriptions in the field. © 1999 E & FN Spon.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23261
ISSN: 1466433X
DOI: 10.1080/014461999371646
Rights: © Taylor & Francis
Type: Article
Affiliation : Queensland University of Technology 
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

65
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

261
Last Week
2
Last month
8
checked on Jul 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons