Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23114
Title: Nursing and Allied Health Research Priorities in the Care of Patients With Thoracic Malignancies: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
Authors: Molassiotis, Alex 
Fraser, Anne 
Culligan, Melissa 
Labuc, Pippa 
Csaba, Degi L. 
Charalambous, Andreas 
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: Health Sciences
Keywords: Allied health professionals;Interventions;Lung cancer;Nursing;Quality of life;Research priorities;Symptoms;Thoracic malignancies
Issue Date: 26-Oct-2020
Source: Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, articl. no. 591799
Volume: 10
Journal: Frontiers in Oncology 
Abstract: Background: There is currently no evidence of research priorities from nurses and allied health professionals working in the field of thoracic malignancies, which could provide strategic directions for funders, policy makers, and researchers. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the priorities for lung cancer and other thoracic malignancies research and practice in nurses and allied health professionals. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional web-based international survey conducted through international societies’ membership lists. Results: Participants included 152 nurses and allied health professionals. Key priority categories were related to developing and evaluation interventions; symptom management interventions; health care system issues; treatment-related research (immunotherapy; targeted therapies); persistent/late effects management (fatigue; pulmonary toxicity); risk reduction, and screening research. The specific topic with the highest endorsement (80.9%) was the development of interventions to improve quality of life. Symptom management interventions, particularly for pain, dyspnea, and fatigue, were also highly endorsed. Health care system topics were related to delivery of care and included nurse-/allied health-led care (67.5%), working with the multidisciplinary team (67.5%), continuity of care (69.2%), and access to care (67.5%). Topics around screening/early detection research were highly endorsed too. Conclusion: A clear focus (and need) for research in interventions to improve quality of life and symptom management, particularly for pain, dyspnea, and fatigue was also established, alongside healthcare system issues and screening research. Implications for practice: International societies and funding bodies could consider these topics in their funding decisions and in shaping their strategic directions in the care of patients with thoracic malignancies.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23114
ISSN: 2234943X
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.591799
Rights: © Molassiotis, Fraser, Culligan, Labuc, Csaba and Charalambous. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Type: Article
Affiliation : The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 
Auckland City Hospital 
University of Maryland Medical Center 
Guy’s and St Thomas’​ NHS Foundation Trust 
Babeş-Bolyai University 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fonc-10-591799.pdfFulltext250.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Mar 17, 2024

Page view(s)

309
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Download(s)

158
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons