Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23114
Title: | Nursing and Allied Health Research Priorities in the Care of Patients With Thoracic Malignancies: An International Cross-Sectional Survey | Authors: | Molassiotis, Alex Fraser, Anne Culligan, Melissa Labuc, Pippa Csaba, Degi L. Charalambous, Andreas |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Health Sciences | Keywords: | Allied health professionals;Interventions;Lung cancer;Nursing;Quality of life;Research priorities;Symptoms;Thoracic malignancies | Issue Date: | 26-Oct-2020 | Source: | Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, articl. no. 591799 | Volume: | 10 | Journal: | Frontiers in Oncology | Abstract: | Background: There is currently no evidence of research priorities from nurses and allied health professionals working in the field of thoracic malignancies, which could provide strategic directions for funders, policy makers, and researchers. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the priorities for lung cancer and other thoracic malignancies research and practice in nurses and allied health professionals. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional web-based international survey conducted through international societies’ membership lists. Results: Participants included 152 nurses and allied health professionals. Key priority categories were related to developing and evaluation interventions; symptom management interventions; health care system issues; treatment-related research (immunotherapy; targeted therapies); persistent/late effects management (fatigue; pulmonary toxicity); risk reduction, and screening research. The specific topic with the highest endorsement (80.9%) was the development of interventions to improve quality of life. Symptom management interventions, particularly for pain, dyspnea, and fatigue, were also highly endorsed. Health care system topics were related to delivery of care and included nurse-/allied health-led care (67.5%), working with the multidisciplinary team (67.5%), continuity of care (69.2%), and access to care (67.5%). Topics around screening/early detection research were highly endorsed too. Conclusion: A clear focus (and need) for research in interventions to improve quality of life and symptom management, particularly for pain, dyspnea, and fatigue was also established, alongside healthcare system issues and screening research. Implications for practice: International societies and funding bodies could consider these topics in their funding decisions and in shaping their strategic directions in the care of patients with thoracic malignancies. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23114 | ISSN: | 2234943X | DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2020.591799 | Rights: | © Molassiotis, Fraser, Culligan, Labuc, Csaba and Charalambous. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Auckland City Hospital University of Maryland Medical Center Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Babeş-Bolyai University Cyprus University of Technology |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
fonc-10-591799.pdf | Fulltext | 250.48 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Mar 17, 2024
Page view(s) 50
313
Last Week
2
2
Last month
2
2
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Download(s)
162
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License