Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23114
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMolassiotis, Alex-
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorCulligan, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorLabuc, Pippa-
dc.contributor.authorCsaba, Degi L.-
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T11:31:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-24T11:31:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-26-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Oncology, vol. 10, articl. no. 591799en_US
dc.identifier.issn2234943X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23114-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is currently no evidence of research priorities from nurses and allied health professionals working in the field of thoracic malignancies, which could provide strategic directions for funders, policy makers, and researchers. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the priorities for lung cancer and other thoracic malignancies research and practice in nurses and allied health professionals. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional web-based international survey conducted through international societies’ membership lists. Results: Participants included 152 nurses and allied health professionals. Key priority categories were related to developing and evaluation interventions; symptom management interventions; health care system issues; treatment-related research (immunotherapy; targeted therapies); persistent/late effects management (fatigue; pulmonary toxicity); risk reduction, and screening research. The specific topic with the highest endorsement (80.9%) was the development of interventions to improve quality of life. Symptom management interventions, particularly for pain, dyspnea, and fatigue, were also highly endorsed. Health care system topics were related to delivery of care and included nurse-/allied health-led care (67.5%), working with the multidisciplinary team (67.5%), continuity of care (69.2%), and access to care (67.5%). Topics around screening/early detection research were highly endorsed too. Conclusion: A clear focus (and need) for research in interventions to improve quality of life and symptom management, particularly for pain, dyspnea, and fatigue was also established, alongside healthcare system issues and screening research. Implications for practice: International societies and funding bodies could consider these topics in their funding decisions and in shaping their strategic directions in the care of patients with thoracic malignancies.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Oncologyen_US
dc.rights© Molassiotis, Fraser, Culligan, Labuc, Csaba and Charalambous. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAllied health professionalsen_US
dc.subjectInterventionsen_US
dc.subjectLung canceren_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectResearch prioritiesen_US
dc.subjectSymptomsen_US
dc.subjectThoracic malignanciesen_US
dc.titleNursing and Allied Health Research Priorities in the Care of Patients With Thoracic Malignancies: An International Cross-Sectional Surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.collaborationAuckland City Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Maryland Medical Centeren_US
dc.collaborationGuy’s and St Thomas’​ NHS Foundation Trusten_US
dc.collaborationBabeş-Bolyai Universityen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryHong Kongen_US
dc.countryNew Zealanden_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryRomaniaen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2020.591799en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33194753-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85095705547-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85095705547-
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4050-031X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fonc-10-591799.pdfFulltext250.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Mar 17, 2024

Page view(s)

275
Last Week
1
Last month
12
checked on May 21, 2024

Download(s)

136
checked on May 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons