Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22832
Τίτλος: | SCALE WARS: AN EXPLORATION OF ‘INTERVAL-VALUED SCALE’ ATTRIBUTES IN MARKETING RESEARCH | Συγγραφείς: | Pagiaslis, Anastasios Themistocleous, Christos Smith, Andrew Wagner, Christian |
Editors: | Haws, Kelly Houston, Mark Noble, Charles |
Major Field of Science: | Social Sciences | Field Category: | Economics and Business | Λέξεις-κλειδιά: | Marketing Management,;Methodological;Measurement scales;Survey design;Management | Ημερομηνία Έκδοσης: | 6-Αυγ-2017 | Πηγή: | American Marketing Association 2017 Conference INNOVATION & SUSTAINABILITY IN MARKETING, San Fransciso | Link: | https://www.ama.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2017-ama-summer-proceedings.pdf | Conference: | American Marketing Association Conference: Innovation and Sustainability in Marketing | Περίληψη: | Crisp single-point capturing scales such as Semantic Differential, Likert and Stapel are commonly used in marketing research. Even though crisp single-point capturing scales offer valuable information regarding the respondents’ perceptions on a specific topic, more recently-developed scales allow responses to be recorded by specifying an interval from the provided scale. Wagner et al., (2015) introduce interval-valued scales in surveys not only providing respondents with the ability of recording their answer accurately but also allowing the representation of uncertainty that may be included in respondents’ answers. Miller et al., (2014) note that interval-valued survey data, modelled through the Interval Agreement Approach (IAA), offer richer information compared to traditional single-point capturing scales. The aim of this paper is to explore Interval-Valued Scales (IVS) in a marketing research context and provide comparative results of an initial study between IVS and Semantic Differential Scales (SDS). This initial comparative exploration of IVS vs SDS is based on scale attributes as advocated by Preston & Colman (2000) namely: i) Ease of use, ii) Speed of use, iii) Ability to precisely record desired answers, iv) Adequate expression of exact thoughts and feelings, v) Certainty/Uncertainty with personal answers and vi) Overall satisfaction with each scale. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22832 | ISBN: | 0-87757-366-2 | ISSN: | 1054-0806 | Rights: | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | Type: | Conference Papers | Affiliation: | University of Nottingham | Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Εμφανίζεται στις συλλογές: | Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation |
Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο:
Αρχείο | Περιγραφή | Μέγεθος | Μορφότυπος | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Extended AMA Abstract 3.1.pdf | 200.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Δείτε/ Ανοίξτε |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
261
Last Week
0
0
Last month
2
2
checked on 7 Νοε 2024
Download(s) 50
56
checked on 7 Νοε 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Αυτό το τεκμήριο προστατεύεται από άδεια Άδεια Creative Commons