Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22741
Title: | Microbial electrolysis cells for decentralisedwastewater treatment: The next steps | Authors: | Fudge, Thomas Bulmer, Isabella Bowman, Kyle Pathmakanthan, Shangami Gambier, William Dehouche, Zahir Al-Salem, S. M. Constantinou, Achilleas |
Major Field of Science: | Natural Sciences | Field Category: | Chemical Sciences | Keywords: | Wastewater treatment;Microbial electrolysis cell;Methane production;Hydrogen production;Waste management;Cathode;Anode;Water research;Renewable energy | Issue Date: | 2-Feb-2021 | Source: | Water, 2021, vol. 13, no. 4, articl. no. 445 | Volume: | 13 | Issue: | 4 | Journal: | Water | Abstract: | Traditional wastewater treatment methods have become aged and inefficient, meaning alternative methods are essential to protect the environment and ensure water and energy security worldwide. The use of microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) for wastewater treatment provides an innovative alternative, working towards circular wastewater treatment for energy production. This study evaluates the factors hindering industrial adoption of this technology and proposes the next steps for further research and development. Existing pilot-scale investigations are studied to critically assess the main limitations, focusing on the electrode material, feedstock, system design and inoculation and what steps need to be taken for industrial adoption of the technology. It was found that high strength influents lead to an increase in energy production, improving economic viability; however, large variations in waste streams indicated that a homogenous solution to wastewater treatment is unlikely with changes to the MEC system specific to different waste streams. The current capital cost of implementing MECs is high and reducing the cost of the electrodes should be a priority. Previous pilot-scale studies have predominantly used carbon-based materials. Significant reductions in relative performance are observed when electrodes increase in size. Inoculation time was found to be a significant barrier to quick operational performance. Economic analysis of the technology indicated that MECs offer an attractive option for wastewater treatment, namely greater energy production and improved treatment efficiency. However, a significant reduction in capital cost is necessary to make this economically viable. MEC based systems should offer improvements in system reliability, reduced downtime, improved treatment rates and improved energy return. Discussion of the merits of H2 or CH4 production indicates that an initial focus on methane production could provide a stepping-stone in the adoption of this technology while the hydrogen market matures. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22741 | ISSN: | 20734441 | DOI: | 10.3390/w13040445 | Rights: | This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Brunel University London WASE Limited Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research London South Bank University University College London Cyprus University of Technology |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
water-13-00445-v3.pdf | Fulltext | 1.53 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
19
checked on Mar 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s) 50
310
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Download(s) 20
196
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License