Repository logoCyprus University of Technology
Log In(current)
Ελληνικά
English
  1. Home
  2. Cyprus University of Technology (Research Output)
  3. Άρθρα/Articles
  4. A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland
  • Details

A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Date Issued
April 1, 2020
Author(s)
Cole, Lorna J.  
Kleijn, David  
Dicks, Lynn  
Stout, Jane Catherine  
Potts, Simon Geoffrey  
Albrecht, Matthias  
Balzan, Mario V.  
Bartomeus, Ignasi  
Bebeli, Penelope J.  
Bevk, Danilo  
Biesmeijer, Jacobus Christiaan (Koos)  
Chlebo, Róbert  
Dautartė, Anželika  
Emmanouil, Nikolaos G.  
Hartfield, Chris M.  
Holland, John M.  
Holzschuh, Andrea  
Knoben, Nieke T.J.  
Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó  
Mandelik, Yael  
Panou, Heleni N.  
Paxton, Robert John  
Petanidou, Theodora  
Pinheiro de Carvalho, Miguel Â.A.  
Rundlöf, Maj  
Sarthou, Jean Pierre  
Stavrinides, Menelaos  
Suso, María José  
Szentgyörgyi, Hajnalka  
Vaissière, Bernard E.  
Varnava, Androulla I.  
Vilà, Montserrat  
Zemeckis, Romualdas  
Scheper, Jeroen  
DOI
10.1111/1365-2664.13572
Abstract
Agricultural intensification and associated loss of high-quality habitats are key drivers of insect pollinator declines. With the aim of decreasing the environmental impact of agriculture, the 2014 EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) defined a set of habitat and landscape features (Ecological Focus Areas: EFAs) farmers could select from as a requirement to receive basic farm payments. To inform the post-2020 CAP, we performed a European-scale evaluation to determine how different EFA options vary in their potential to support insect pollinators under standard and pollinator-friendly management, as well as the extent of farmer uptake. A structured Delphi elicitation process engaged 22 experts from 18 European countries to evaluate EFAs options. By considering life cycle requirements of key pollinating taxa (i.e. bumble bees, solitary bees and hoverflies), each option was evaluated for its potential to provide forage, bee nesting sites and hoverfly larval resources. EFA options varied substantially in the resources they were perceived to provide and their effectiveness varied geographically and temporally. For example, field margins provide relatively good forage throughout the season in Southern and Eastern Europe but lacked early-season forage in Northern and Western Europe. Under standard management, no single EFA option achieved high scores across resource categories and a scarcity of late season forage was perceived. Experts identified substantial opportunities to improve habitat quality by adopting pollinator-friendly management. Improving management alone was, however, unlikely to ensure that all pollinator resource requirements were met. Our analyses suggest that a combination of poor management, differences in the inherent pollinator habitat quality and uptake bias towards catch crops and nitrogen-fixing crops severely limit the potential of EFAs to support pollinators in European agricultural landscapes. Policy Implications. To conserve pollinators and help protect pollination services, our expert elicitation highlights the need to create a variety of interconnected, well-managed habitats that complement each other in the resources they offer. To achieve this the Common Agricultural Policy post-2020 should take a holistic view to implementation that integrates the different delivery vehicles aimed at protecting biodiversity (e.g. enhanced conditionality, eco-schemes and agri-environment and climate measures). To improve habitat quality we recommend an effective monitoring framework with target-orientated indicators and to facilitate the spatial targeting of options collaboration between land managers should be incentivised.
Subjects

Agri-environment sche...

Bees

CAP Green Architectur...

Common Agricultural P...

Ecological Focus Area...

Habitat complementari...

Pollination services

Pollinator conservati...

File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

1365-2664.13572.pdf

Size

1.43 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

82d3365f95fd0dffb8f47f8fe47e1073

Explore by
  • Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Faculty & Departments
  • Theses
  • Patents
  • Projects
  • Journals
  • Conferences
Useful Links
  • Researcher Portfolio Guide
  • Researcher Profile
  • Create an ORCID ID
  • CUT Open Access Author Fund
  • ETDS Guide
Copyright Policies

Use Sherpa/Romeo to find publisher copyright policies

Go
Go
  • SPARC Author Addendum Engine
  • National Open Access Policy in Cyprus
Deposit your work to Ktisis
  • Self-archiving. Please sign in to Ktisis.
  • Email your work to:
    library.dspace@cut.ac.cy
  • Contact your subject librarian

Member of

OpenAIREre3dataOpenDOARCOREDART
Cyprus University of Technology
Library and
Information
Services

Copyright © 2022 - Library and Information Services Feedback - Built with DSpace-CRIS - 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
COAR NotifyCOAR Notify