Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1061
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZyga, Sofia-
dc.contributor.authorSarafis, Pavlos-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-06T14:49:34Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:44:17Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-06T14:49:34Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:44:17Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationHealth Science Journal, 2009, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 209-215en_US
dc.identifier.issn1791809X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1061-
dc.description.abstractHaemodialysis constitutes a prescribed clinical action, a fact which leads us to the search of indexes that control the adequacy of haemodialysis and to a more precise estimation of the intended and the performed result. Objective: The purpose of this literature review was to present the quantitative and mathematical indexes used for the calculation of the haemodialysis adequacy in the daily clinical practice. Method and material: The method οf this study included bibliography research from both the review and the research literature which carried out mainly internationally over the last years and referred to haemodialysis adequacy. Results: In daily clinical practice, useful tools for the calculation of haemodialysis adequacy are the indexes Urea Reduction Rate (URR), single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V) index, equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) index and weekly standard Kt/V (std Kt/V) index. The knowledge of factors that influence the urea clearance within treatment and can offer important help to the successful haemodialysis prescription, are: blood flow, filter permeability, haemodialysis dialysate flow and recirculation. Clinical indexes are may also be considered for a more effective haemodialysis process: good natural health, good regulation of arterial pressure, good regulation of liquids balance and absence of clinical points or uraemia symptoms. Conclusions: The main conclusion of the present review is to apply the indexes in daily clinical practice. Moreover, it is important to set out certain proposals for further research, so that the health professionals improve not only the clinical practice but also the theoretical approach in the field of determination and estimation of haemodialysis adequacy.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Science Journalen_US
dc.rights© Health Science Journalen_US
dc.subjectAdequacyen_US
dc.subjectHaemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectKt/V indexen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subjectUraemiaen_US
dc.titleHaemodialysis adequacy – contemporary trendsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.linkhttps://www.hsj.gr/medicine/haemodialysis-adequacy--contemporary-trends.php?aid=3626en_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Peloponneseen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPeer Revieweden
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume3en_US
cut.common.academicyear2009-2010en_US
dc.identifier.spage209en_US
dc.identifier.epage215en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9967-5152-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1791-809X-
crisitem.journal.publisheriMedPub-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

470
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Feb 2, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.