Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10554
Title: Graphic symbols terminology: a call for a consensus
Authors: Pampoulou, Eliada 
Major Field of Science: Humanities
Field Category: Arts
Keywords: Semiotics;Definition;AAC;Graphic symbols;Manual symbols;Spoken symbols
Issue Date: 2017
Source: Journal of Enabling Technologies, 2017, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 92-100
Volume: 11
Issue: 3
Start page: 92
End page: 100
Journal: Journal of Enabling Technologies 
Abstract: Graphic symbols, such as the Picture Communication Symbols, Makaton and Widgit, have been traditionally used in the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in order to support people with little or no functional speech. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach However, given the fact that the terminology remains contested in the existing literature as well as the multidisciplinary nature surrounding graphic symbols, in more recent years and the number of terms used in different fields, it is vital that the terminology of graphic symbols is revisited again. Findings In the last section of the paper, a definition of graphic symbols is proposed. Originality/value The value of this paper lies in the fact that while field of graphic symbols have been used in the AAC for more than 30 years, there is still no consensus regarding the meaning of the terminology used.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10554
ISSN: 17549450
DOI: 10.1108/JET-02-2017-0008
Rights: © Emerald
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 9, 2023

Page view(s)

494
Last Week
0
Last month
4
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.