Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10506
Title: Computer aided detection in prostate cancer diagnostics: A promising alternative to biopsy? A retrospective study from 104 lesions with histological ground truth
Authors: Thon, Anika 
Teichgräber, Ulf 
Tennstedt-Schenk, Cornelia 
Hadjidemetriou, Stathis 
Winzler, Sven 
Malich, Ansgar 
Papageorgiou, Ismini 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Other Engineering and Technologies
Keywords: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI);Radiotherapy;Localization;B-Value
Issue Date: Oct-2017
Source: PLoS ONE, 2017, vol. 12, no. 10
Volume: 12
Issue: 10
Journal: PLoS ONE 
Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis by means of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a current challenge for the development of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools. An innovative CAD-software (Watson Elementary (TM)) was proposed to achieve high sensitivity and specificity, as well as to allege a correlate to Gleason grade. Aim/Objective To assess the performance of Watson Elementary (TM) in automated PCa diagnosis in our hospital's database of MRI-guided prostate biopsies. Methods The evaluation was retrospective for 104 lesions (47 PCa, 57 benign) from 79, 64.61 +/- 6.64 year old patients using 3T T2-weighted imaging, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps and dynamic contrast enhancement series. Watson Elementary (TM) utilizes signal intensity, diffusion properties and kinetic profile to compute a proportional Gleason grade predictor, termed Malignancy Attention Index (MAI). The analysis focused on (i) the CAD sensitivity and specificity to classify suspect lesions and (ii) the MAI correlation with the histopathological ground truth. Results The software revealed a sensitivity of 46.80% for PCa classification. The specificity for PCa was found to be 75.43% with a positive predictive value of 61.11%, a negative predictive value of 63.23% and a false discovery rate of 38.89%. CAD classified PCa and benign lesions with equal probability (P 0.06,chi(2) test). Accordingly, receiver operating characteristic analysis suggests a poor predictive value for MAI with an area under curve of 0.65 (P 0.02), which is not superior to the performance of board certified observers. Moreover, MAI revealed no significant correlation with Gleason grade (P 0.60, Pearson's correlation). Conclusion The tested CAD software for mpMRI analysis was a weak PCa biomarker in this dataset. Targeted prostate biopsy and histology remains the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10506
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185995
Rights: © Thon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cyprus University of Technology 
Friedrich Schiller University of Jena 
Suedharz Hospital Nordhausen 
University of Bern 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Hadjidemetriou.pdf12.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

17
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

391
Last Week
1
Last month
7
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

106
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.