Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8631
Title: Combination of chest compressions and interposed abdominal compressions in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
Authors: Georgiou, Marios 
Papathanassoglou, Elizabeth 
Middleton, Nicos 
Papalois, Apostolos 
Xanthos, Theodoros 
metadata.dc.contributor.other: Μίτλεττον, Νίκος
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
Keywords: Chest compressions;Swine model
Issue Date: 1-Jun-2016
Source: The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2016, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 968-974
Volume: 34
Issue: 6
Start page: 968
End page: 974
Journal: The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 
Abstract: Purpose.The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the combination of chest compressions and interposed abdominal compressions (IAC-CPR) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation (VF).Methods Twenty healthy female Landrace-Large White pigs were the study subjects. At the end of the eighth minute of VF, animals in the control group (Group A) received chest compressions at a rate of 100/min, while animals in the experimental group received chest compressions and simultaneous interposed abdominal compressions (CC-IAC – Group B), both at a rate of 100/min. The primary end point of the experiment was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Secondary outcomes were 48-h survival rate and 48-h neurologic outcome.Results.Six animals (60%) from Group A and 9 animals (90%) from Group B achieved ROSC (P = .121). There was a statistically significant difference in systolic aortic pressure, mean aortic pressure, right atrial pressures, and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) between the two groups during the first cycle of CPR, while during the second cycle, diastolic aortic pressure was significantly higher in Group B. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) values in group B were significantly higher compared with those in Group A during the first and second cycle of CPR. Neurologic examination was statistically significantly better in Group B (75.00 ± 10.00 vs. 90.00 ± 10.00, P = .037).Conclusion ROSC did not differ statistically significant in the IAC-CPR compared to the CPR group only, while CPP was significantly higher in IAC-CPR–treated animals.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8631
ISSN: 07356757
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.008
Rights: © Elsevier
Type: Article
Affiliation : American Heart Institute 
Cyprus Resuscitation Council 
Cyprus University of Technology 
University of Alberta 
ELPEN Research Experimental Center 
European University Cyprus 
Hellenic Society of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation 
Publication Type: Non Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

439
Last Week
2
Last month
4
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.