Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/4412
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConstantinides, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorUlm, Franz Josef-
dc.contributor.authorVandamme, Matthieu-
dc.contributor.authorJennings, Hamlin M.-
dc.contributor.authorVanzo, James-
dc.contributor.authorBentivegna, Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorKrakowiak, Konrad J.-
dc.contributor.authorBobko, Christopher P.-
dc.contributor.authorVliet, Krystyn J Van-
dc.contributor.otherΚωνσταντινίδης, Γιώργος-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-08T08:40:25Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T10:30:41Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-09T12:08:16Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-08T08:40:25Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T10:30:41Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T12:08:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-
dc.identifier.citationCement and Concrete Composites, 2010, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 92-99en_US
dc.identifier.issn09589465-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/4412-
dc.description.abstractIn their paper, Trtik et al. (2009) identify spurious peaks in the application of statistical nanoindentation technique as a critical obstacle for mechanical phase identification. In this discussion, we show that Trtik et al.'s finding is a consequence of an unrealistic virtual 3-D checkerboard microstructure considered by the authors. These peaks are not a general feature of indentation on multiphase materials, nor can the presence of such peaks be attributed to an intrinsic shortcoming of the grid-indentation technique. We also show that the authors' assertion of the absence of homogeneous material regions extending beyond 3 μm in cementitious materials is groundless.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCement and Concrete Compositesen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectMicrostructureen_US
dc.subjectStatistical methodsen_US
dc.subjectCement compositesen_US
dc.titleDoes microstructure matter for statistical nanoindentation techniques?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversite Parisen_US
dc.collaborationNorthwestern Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Minhoen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationNorth Carolina State Universityen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewpeer reviewed-
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryFranceen_US
dc.countryPortugalen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.08.007en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/141en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume32en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage92en_US
dc.identifier.epage99en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0958-9465-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1979-5176-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.