Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3752
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElefsiniotis, Ioannis S.-
dc.contributor.authorApostolopoulou, Eleni A.-
dc.contributor.authorTerzis, Konstantinos-
dc.contributor.authorRaftopoulos, Vasilios-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T08:09:16Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-09T09:41:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-09T08:09:16Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T09:41:57Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-26-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases, 2010, vol. 10, no. 135, pp.1-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712334-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3752-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) in neutropenic patients often cause considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the surveillance and early identification of patients at high risk for developing BSIs might be useful for the development of preventive measures. The aim of the current study was to assess the predictive power of three scoring systems: Infection Probability Score (IPS), APACHE II and KARNOFSKY score for the onset of Bloodstream Infections in hematology-oncology patients.Methods: A total of 102 patients who were hospitalized for more than 48 hours in a hematology-oncology department in Athens, Greece between April 1stand October 31st2007 were included in the study. Data were collected by using an anonymous standardized recording form. Source materials included medical records, temperature charts, information from nursing and medical staff, and results on microbiological testing. Patients were followed daily until hospital discharge or death.Results: Among the 102 patients, Bloodstream Infections occurred in 17 (16.6%) patients. The incidence density of Bloodstream Infections was 7.74 per 1,000 patient-days or 21.99 per 1,000 patient-days at risk. The patients who developed a Bloodstream Infection were mainly females (p = 0.004), with twofold time mean length of hospital stay (p <, 0.001), with fourfold time mean length of neutropenia (p <, 0.001), with neutropenia <, 500 (p <, 0.001), suffered mainly from acute myeloid leukemia (p <, 0.001), had been exposed to antibiotics (p = 0.045) and chemotherapy (p = 0.023), had a surgery (p = 0.048) and a Hickman catheter (p = 0.025) as compared to the patients without Bloodstream Infection. The best cut-off value of IPS for the prediction of a Bloodstream Infection was 10 with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 70.9%. Conclusion: Between the three different prognostic scoring systems, Infection Probability Score had the best sensitivity in predicting Bloodstream Infections. 2010 Apostolopoulou et al, licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.rights© BioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic agenten_US
dc.subjectAcute granulocytic leukemiaen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAPACHEen_US
dc.subjectBloodstream infectionen_US
dc.subjectCatheterizationen_US
dc.subjectControlled studyen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic valueen_US
dc.subjectDrug exposureen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGreeceen_US
dc.subjectHumanen_US
dc.subjectInfection Probability Scoreen_US
dc.subjectInfection risken_US
dc.subjectKarnofsky Performance Statusen_US
dc.subjectLength of stayen_US
dc.subjectMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectNeutropeniaen_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective studyen_US
dc.subjectScoring systemen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subjectBacteremiaen_US
dc.subjectBlood diseaseen_US
dc.subjectFungemiaen_US
dc.subjectHospitalizationen_US
dc.subjectMiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectNeutropeniaen_US
dc.titleInfection probability score, APACHE II and KARNOFSKY scoring systems as predictors of bloodstream infection onset in hematology-oncology patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationHalkida General Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationMediterranean Research Centre for Public Health and Quality of Careen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.reviewPeer Reviewed-
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2334-10-135en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20504343-
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue135en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage8en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1471-2334-
crisitem.journal.publisherBioMed Central-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1042-642X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Raftopoulos.pdf526.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

467
Last Week
1
Last month
8
checked on May 12, 2024

Download(s)

424
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.