Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/31136
Title: Spray process of multi-component gasoline surrogate fuel under ECN Spray G conditions
Authors: Hwang, Joonsik 
Karathanassis, Ioannis K. 
Koukouvinis, Phoevos 
Nguyen, Tuan 
Tagliante, Fabien 
Pickett, Lyle M. 
Sforzo, Brandon A. 
Powell, Christopher F. 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Mechanical Engineering
Keywords: Fuel sprays;Atomisation
Issue Date: 5-Feb-2024
Source: International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2024
Journal: International Journal of Multiphase Flow 
Abstract: As modern gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines utilize sophisticated injection strategies, a detailed understanding of the air-fuel mixing process is crucial to further improvements in engine emission and fuel economy. In this study, a comprehensive evaluation of the spray process of single-component iso-octane (IC8) and multi-component gasoline surrogate E00 (36% n-pentane, 46% iso-octane, and 18% n-undecane, by volume) fuels was conducted using an Engine Combustion Network (ECN) Spray G injector. High-speed extinction, schlieren, and microscopy imaging campaigns were carried out under engine-like ambient conditions in a spray vessel. Experimental results including liquid/vapor penetration, local liquid volume fraction, droplet size, and projected liquid film on the nozzle tip were compared under ECN G1 (573 K, 3.5 kg/m3), G2 (333 K, 0.5 kg/ m3), and G3 (333 K, 1.01 kg/ m3) conditions. In addition to the experiments, preferential evaporation process of the E00 fuel was elucidated by Large-Eddy Simulations (LES). The three-dimensional liquid volume fraction measurement enabled by the computed tomographic reconstruction showed substantial plume collapse for E00 under the G2 and G3 conditions having wider plume growth and plume-to-plume interaction due to the fuel high vapor pressure. The CFD simulation of E00 showed an inhomogeneity in the way fuel components vaporized, with more volatile components carried downstream in the spray after the end of injection. The high vapor pressure of E00 also results in ∼4 μm smaller average droplet diameter than IC8, reflecting a higher rate of initial vaporization even though the final boiling point temperature is higher. Consistent with high vapor pressure, E00 had a wider plume cone angle and enhanced interaction with the wall to cover the entire surface of the nozzle tip in a film. However, the liquid fuel underwent faster evaporation, so the final projected tip wetting area was smaller than the IC8 under the flash-boiling condition.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/31136
ISSN: 03019322
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104753
Type: Article
Affiliation : Mississippi State University 
University of London 
Sandia National Laboratories 
Argonne National Laboratory 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

Page view(s)

76
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Nov 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.