Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30673
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSofokleous, Ioannis-
dc.contributor.authorBruggeman, Adriana-
dc.contributor.authorCamera, Corrado-
dc.contributor.authorEliades, Marinos-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T07:37:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-20T07:37:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hydrology, 2023, vol. 617en_US
dc.identifier.issn00221694-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30673-
dc.description.abstractThe physically-based distributed WRF-Hydro modelling system, including the Noah land surface model with multiple parameterization options (Noah-MP) and the hydrological extension of the WRF atmospheric model (Weather Research and Forecasting model), has recently been widely used for water balance investigations, streamflow and coupled land–atmosphere simulations. Despite the multiple available physical parameterizations in the model, equations for simulating particular losses from the water balance are missing, and a grid-based calibration of distributed parameters across multiple watersheds has not been studied. To fill these gaps, this study aims: (i) to analyze the impact of soil, runoff, groundwater and vegetation parameters on water balance components; (ii) to improve baseflow and transpiration equations; and (iii) to test a grid-based calibration approach for distributed model parameters, using streamflow observations. The WRF-Hydro groundwater model was improved through the introduction of a groundwater loss factor and the Jarvis stomatal conductance model was modified to account for nocturnal transpiration. The grid-based calibration was performed for three parameters (infiltration, hydraulic conductivity and percolation) for 19 spatially-distributed classes, with the Parameter Estimation (PEST) software. The study area includes 31 small mountainous watersheds (5–115 km2) in Cyprus, in the Eastern Mediterranean. A two-year period (2011–2013) was used for calibration and a five-year period (2013–2018) for the evaluation. The baseline model set-up overestimated streamflow, on average, by 50 % in 2011–2012 and more than 100 % in 2012–2013. Overall, streamflow and evapotranspiration (ET) could vary by about ±30 % from the baseline simulation, using different model parameters and model options. The simulation of groundwater losses as a function of groundwater level reduced total streamflow, on average, by 30 %. The use of the proposed Jarvis equation for nocturnal transpiration increased the total ET, on average, by 25 %. The grid-based approach facilitated the calibration of the distributed parameters over the area of the 31 watersheds. The median Nash-Sutcliff Efficiency (NSE) was 0.49 during calibration, but 0.02 in the drier evaluation period. The calibrated WRF-Hydro model reproduced the annual variability of ET and the improved groundwater and transpiration equations reduced the substantial streamflow overestimation of WRF-Hydro. The model performance during dry years demonstrated the need for representation of more processes that occur in semi-arid environments with ephemeral streams and are not included in WRF-Hydro and Noah-MP. The grid-based WRF-Hydro parameterization can be applied to the full study area for fully-coupled atmospheric-hydrologic simulations.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hydrologyen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s)en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectConceptual groundwater modelen_US
dc.subjectGrid-based calibrationen_US
dc.subjectNoah-MPen_US
dc.subjectNocturnal transpirationen_US
dc.subjectSemi-ariden_US
dc.subjectWRF-Hydroen_US
dc.titleGrid-based calibration of the WRF-Hydro with Noah-MP model with improved groundwater and transpiration process equationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationThe Cyprus Instituteen_US
dc.collaborationUniversità degli Studi di Milanoen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Natural Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.categoryENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128991en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146426952-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85146426952-
dc.relation.volume617en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0022-1694-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0715-9511-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
eliades 1.pdfFull text7.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

5
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

108
Last Week
1
Last month
6
checked on Oct 10, 2024

Download(s) 50

54
checked on Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons