Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30403
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArgyrou, Argyro-
dc.contributor.authorAgapiou, Athos-
dc.contributor.authorPapakonstantinou, Apostolos-
dc.contributor.authorAlexakis, Dimitrios D.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-15T08:03:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-15T08:03:19Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-13-
dc.identifier.citationDrones, 2023, vol.7 no.9en_US
dc.identifier.issn2504446X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30403-
dc.description.abstractRecent improvements in low-altitude remote sensors and image processing analysis can be utilised to support archaeological research. Over the last decade, the increased use of remote sensing sensors and their products for archaeological science and cultural heritage studies has been reported in the literature. Therefore, different spatial and spectral analysis datasets have been applied to recognise archaeological remains or map environmental changes over time. Recently, more thorough object detection approaches have been adopted by researchers for the automated detection of surface ceramics. In this study, we applied several supervised machine learning classifiers using red-green-blue (RGB) and multispectral high-resolution drone imageries over a simulated archaeological area to evaluate their performance towards semi-automatic surface ceramic detection. The overall results indicated that low-altitude remote sensing sensors and advanced image processing techniques can be innovative in archaeological research. Nevertheless, the study results also pointed out existing research limitations in the detection of surface ceramics, which affect the detection accuracy. The development of a novel, robust methodology aimed to address the “accuracy paradox” of imbalanced data samples for optimising archaeological surface ceramic detection. At the same time, this study attempted to fill a gap in the literature by blending AI methodologies for non-uniformly distributed classes. Indeed, detecting surface ceramics using RGB or multi-spectral drone imageries should be reconsidered as an ‘imbalanced data distribution’ problem. To address this paradox, novel approaches need to be developed.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relationCIVIL ENGINEERING AND GEOMATICS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH ON HERITAGE (ENGINEER)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofDronesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCeramic detectionen_US
dc.subjectArchaeologyen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensing archaeologyen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectImbalanced data distribution;en_US
dc.subjectDrone dataen_US
dc.subjectUAVen_US
dc.titleComparison of Machine Learning Pixel-Based Classifiers for Detecting Archaeological Ceramicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationLaboratory of Geophysical-Satellite Remote Sensing and Archaeo-Environment, Foundation for Research and Technology, Hellas (F.O.R.T.H.)en_US
dc.collaborationERATOSTHENES Centre of Excellenceen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/drones7090578en_US
dc.relation.issue9en_US
dc.relation.volume7en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2504-446X-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.project.funderEC-
crisitem.project.grantnoHORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ACCESS-03/101079377-
crisitem.project.fundingProgramHE-
crisitem.project.openAireinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101079377-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6134-5799-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9106-6766-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6464-2008-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Comparison of Machine Learning.pdf7.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

105
Last Week
5
Last month
8
checked on May 11, 2024

Download(s)

30
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons