Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30083
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMahmić-Kaknjo, Mersiha-
dc.contributor.authorTomić, Vicko-
dc.contributor.authorEllen, Moriah-
dc.contributor.authorNussbaumer-Streit, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorSfetcu, Raluca-
dc.contributor.authorBaladia, Eduard-
dc.contributor.authorRiva, Nicoletta-
dc.contributor.authorKassianos, Angelos P.-
dc.contributor.authorMarušić, Ana-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T10:54:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-29T10:54:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-28-
dc.identifier.citationSystematic Reviews, 2023, vol. 12, iss. 1en_US
dc.identifier.issn20464053-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30083-
dc.description.abstractSystematic reviews (SRs) are invaluable evidence syntheses, widely used in biomedicine and other scientific areas. Tremendous resources are being spent on the production and updating of SRs. There is a continuous need to automatize the process and use the workforce and resources to make it faster and more efficient.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSystematic Reviewsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s)en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAutomation toolsen_US
dc.subjectEvidence syntesisen_US
dc.subjectPrioritizationen_US
dc.titleDelphi survey on the most promising areas and methods to improve systematic reviews' production and updatingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCantonal Hospital Zenicaen_US
dc.collaborationSarajevo School of Science and Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Split School of Medicineen_US
dc.collaborationBen Gurion University of the Negeven_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Torontoen_US
dc.collaborationDanube University Kremsen_US
dc.collaborationSpiru Haret Universityen_US
dc.collaborationAcademia Española de Nutrición y Dietéticaen_US
dc.collaborationNational School of Public Healthen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Maltaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryBosnia and Herzegovinaen_US
dc.countryCroatiaen_US
dc.countryIsraelen_US
dc.countryCanadaen_US
dc.countryAustriaen_US
dc.countryRomaniaen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.countryMaltaen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13643-023-02223-3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36973729-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150968534-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85150968534-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume12en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6428-2623-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
kassianos 3.pdfFull text1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Feb 2, 2024

Page view(s)

124
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Download(s)

42
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons