Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29627
Title: | Radioligand therapies in cancer: mapping the educational landscape in Europe | Authors: | Bugani, Valentina Battistelli, Luca Sansovini, Maddalena Monti, Manuela Paganelli, Giovanni Gich, Ignasi Flotats, Albert Erba, Paola Anna Blay, Jean Yves la Fougère, Christian Van Poppel, Hendrik Charalambous, Andreas Herrmann, Ken Giordano, Alessandro Györke, Tamás Deroose, Christophe Matteucci, Federica Carrió, Ignasi |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES | Keywords: | Radioligand therapy;RLT;Education;Cancer;Survey;Training’s gap | Issue Date: | 1-Jan-2023 | Source: | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2692-2698 | Volume: | 50 | Issue: | 9 | Start page: | 2692 | End page: | 2698 | Journal: | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Abstract: | Aim: We performed a systematic survey to assess the existing gaps in Europe in multidisciplinary education for integration of radioligand therapy (RLT) into cancer care and to obtain detailed information on the current limitations and key contents relevant. Methods: A high-quality questionnaire, with emphasis on survey scales, formulation, and validity of the different items, was designed. An expert validation process was undertaken. The survey was circulated among medical specialties involved in cancer treatment, universities, and nursing organizations. Questionnaires (156) were distributed, and 95 responses received. Results: Sevety-eight percent of medical societies indicated that training in RLT was very important and 12% important. Eighty-eight percent indicated that their specialty training program included RLT. Twenty-six percent were satisfied with the existing structure of training in RLTs. Ninety-four percent indicated that the existing training is based on theory and hands-on experience. Main identified limitations were lack of centers ready to train and of personnel available for teaching. Sixty-five percent indicated that national programs could be expanded. Fifty percent of consulted universities indicated partial or scarce presence of RLT contents in their teaching programs. In 26% of the cases, the students do not have the chance to visit a RLT facility. A large majority of the universities are interested in further expansion of RLT contents in their curriculums. Nursing organizations almost never (44.4%) or occasionally (33.3%) include RLT contents in the education of nurses and technologists. Hands-on experience is almost never (38%) and sometimes (38%) offered. However, 67% of centers indicated high interest in expanding RLT contents. Conclusion: Centers involved recognize the importance of the training and indicate a need for inclusion of additional clinical content, imaging analysis, and interpretation as well as extended hands-on training. A concerted effort to adapt current programs and a shift towards multidisciplinary training programs is necessary for proper education in RLT in Europe. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29627 | ISSN: | 16197070 | DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-023-06217-0 | Rights: | © Springer Nature | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori University of Barcelona Fundació Institut de Recerca Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau University of Barcelona Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana Léon Bérard” Cancer Center University Hospital of Tuebingen KU University Hospitals of Leuven Cyprus University of Technology University of Turku University Hospital of Essen Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Semmelweis University |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
3
checked on Dec 1, 2024
Page view(s)
169
Last Week
1
1
Last month
4
4
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License