Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29627
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBugani, Valentina-
dc.contributor.authorBattistelli, Luca-
dc.contributor.authorSansovini, Maddalena-
dc.contributor.authorMonti, Manuela-
dc.contributor.authorPaganelli, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorGich, Ignasi-
dc.contributor.authorFlotats, Albert-
dc.contributor.authorErba, Paola Anna-
dc.contributor.authorBlay, Jean Yves-
dc.contributor.authorla Fougère, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorVan Poppel, Hendrik-
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Ken-
dc.contributor.authorGiordano, Alessandro-
dc.contributor.authorGyörke, Tamás-
dc.contributor.authorDeroose, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorMatteucci, Federica-
dc.contributor.authorCarrió, Ignasi-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T13:09:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-04T13:09:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2692-2698en_US
dc.identifier.issn16197070-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29627-
dc.description.abstractAim: We performed a systematic survey to assess the existing gaps in Europe in multidisciplinary education for integration of radioligand therapy (RLT) into cancer care and to obtain detailed information on the current limitations and key contents relevant. Methods: A high-quality questionnaire, with emphasis on survey scales, formulation, and validity of the different items, was designed. An expert validation process was undertaken. The survey was circulated among medical specialties involved in cancer treatment, universities, and nursing organizations. Questionnaires (156) were distributed, and 95 responses received. Results: Sevety-eight percent of medical societies indicated that training in RLT was very important and 12% important. Eighty-eight percent indicated that their specialty training program included RLT. Twenty-six percent were satisfied with the existing structure of training in RLTs. Ninety-four percent indicated that the existing training is based on theory and hands-on experience. Main identified limitations were lack of centers ready to train and of personnel available for teaching. Sixty-five percent indicated that national programs could be expanded. Fifty percent of consulted universities indicated partial or scarce presence of RLT contents in their teaching programs. In 26% of the cases, the students do not have the chance to visit a RLT facility. A large majority of the universities are interested in further expansion of RLT contents in their curriculums. Nursing organizations almost never (44.4%) or occasionally (33.3%) include RLT contents in the education of nurses and technologists. Hands-on experience is almost never (38%) and sometimes (38%) offered. However, 67% of centers indicated high interest in expanding RLT contents. Conclusion: Centers involved recognize the importance of the training and indicate a need for inclusion of additional clinical content, imaging analysis, and interpretation as well as extended hands-on training. A concerted effort to adapt current programs and a shift towards multidisciplinary training programs is necessary for proper education in RLT in Europe.en_US
dc.formatPdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imagingen_US
dc.rights© Springer Natureen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectRadioligand therapyen_US
dc.subjectRLTen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.subjectTraining’s gapen_US
dc.titleRadioligand therapies in cancer: mapping the educational landscape in Europeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumorien_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Barcelonaen_US
dc.collaborationFundació Institut de Recerca Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pauen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Barcelonaen_US
dc.collaborationAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisanaen_US
dc.collaborationLéon Bérard” Cancer Centeren_US
dc.collaborationUniversity Hospital of Tuebingenen_US
dc.collaborationKU University Hospitals of Leuvenen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turkuen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity Hospital of Essenen_US
dc.collaborationFondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinicoen_US
dc.collaborationSemmelweis Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCESen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.countryFranceen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countryBelgiumen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00259-023-06217-0en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37058168-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152667196-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85152667196-
dc.relation.issue9en_US
dc.relation.volume50en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
dc.identifier.spage2692en_US
dc.identifier.epage2698en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4050-031X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

3
checked on Dec 1, 2024

Page view(s)

169
Last Week
1
Last month
4
checked on Dec 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons