Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27638
Title: | Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials | Authors: | Yperzeele, Laetitia Shoamanesh, Ashkan Venugopalan, Y. V. Chapman, S. Mazya, Michael V. Charalambous, Marina Caso, V. Hacke, Werner Bath, Philip Koltsov, I. |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Clinical Medicine | Keywords: | Acute stroke care;Acute stroke therapy;Randomized controlled trials;Stroke;Stroke research;Trial design | Issue Date: | 5-Jan-2023 | Source: | Neurological Research and Practice, vol. 5, articl. no. 1 | Volume: | 5 | Journal: | Neurological Research and Practice | Abstract: | Purpose We review key design elements of positive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and summarize their main characteristics. Method We searched Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for positive RCTs in AIS treatment. Trials were included if (1) they had a randomized controlled design, with (at least partial) blinding for endpoints, (2) they tested against placebo (or on top of standard therapy in a superiority design) or against approved therapy; (3) the protocol was registered and/or published before trial termination and unblinding (if required at study commencement); (4) the primary endpoint was positive in the intention to treat analysis; and (5) the study findings led to approval of the investigational product and/or high ranked recommendations. A topical approach was used, therefore the findings were summarized as a narrative review. Findings Seventeen positive RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The majority of trials included less than 1000 patients (n = 15), had highly selective inclusion criteria (n = 16), used the modified Rankin score as a primary endpoint (n = 15) and had a frequentist design (n = 16). Trials tended to be national (n = 12), investigator-initiated and performed with public funding (n = 11). Discussion Smaller but selective trials are useful to identify efficacy in a particular subgroup of stroke patients. It may also be of advantage to limit the number of participating countries and centers to avoid heterogeneity in stroke management and bureaucratic burden. Conclusion The key characteristics of positive RCTs in AIS treatment described here may assist in the design of further trials investigating a single intervention with a potentially high effect size. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27638 | ISSN: | 25243489 | DOI: | 10.1186/s42466-022-00221-9 | Rights: | © The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Cyprus University of Technology Antwerp University Hospital University of Antwerp McMaster University All India Institute of Medical Sciences University of Virginia Karolinska University Hospital Karolinska Institutet University of Fribourg University of Perugia Ruprechts Karl University University of Nottingham Russian National Research Medical University named Pirogov Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Neurological Research and Practice.pdf | 804.7 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Mar 14, 2024
Page view(s)
282
Last Week
1
1
Last month
5
5
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Download(s)
73
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License