Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27638
Title: Key design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trials
Authors: Yperzeele, Laetitia 
Shoamanesh, Ashkan 
Venugopalan, Y. V. 
Chapman, S. 
Mazya, Michael V. 
Charalambous, Marina 
Caso, V. 
Hacke, Werner 
Bath, Philip 
Koltsov, I. 
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: Clinical Medicine
Keywords: Acute stroke care;Acute stroke therapy;Randomized controlled trials;Stroke;Stroke research;Trial design
Issue Date: 5-Jan-2023
Source: Neurological Research and Practice, vol. 5, articl. no. 1
Volume: 5
Journal: Neurological Research and Practice 
Abstract: Purpose We review key design elements of positive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and summarize their main characteristics. Method We searched Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for positive RCTs in AIS treatment. Trials were included if (1) they had a randomized controlled design, with (at least partial) blinding for endpoints, (2) they tested against placebo (or on top of standard therapy in a superiority design) or against approved therapy; (3) the protocol was registered and/or published before trial termination and unblinding (if required at study commencement); (4) the primary endpoint was positive in the intention to treat analysis; and (5) the study findings led to approval of the investigational product and/or high ranked recommendations. A topical approach was used, therefore the findings were summarized as a narrative review. Findings Seventeen positive RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The majority of trials included less than 1000 patients (n = 15), had highly selective inclusion criteria (n = 16), used the modified Rankin score as a primary endpoint (n = 15) and had a frequentist design (n = 16). Trials tended to be national (n = 12), investigator-initiated and performed with public funding (n = 11). Discussion Smaller but selective trials are useful to identify efficacy in a particular subgroup of stroke patients. It may also be of advantage to limit the number of participating countries and centers to avoid heterogeneity in stroke management and bureaucratic burden. Conclusion The key characteristics of positive RCTs in AIS treatment described here may assist in the design of further trials investigating a single intervention with a potentially high effect size.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27638
ISSN: 25243489
DOI: 10.1186/s42466-022-00221-9
Rights: © The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cyprus University of Technology 
Antwerp University Hospital 
University of Antwerp 
McMaster University 
All India Institute of Medical Sciences 
University of Virginia 
Karolinska University Hospital 
Karolinska Institutet 
University of Fribourg 
University of Perugia 
Ruprechts Karl University 
University of Nottingham 
Russian National Research Medical University named Pirogov 
Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Neurological Research and Practice.pdf804.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

282
Last Week
1
Last month
5
checked on Dec 3, 2024

Download(s)

73
checked on Dec 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons