Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27638
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYperzeele, Laetitia-
dc.contributor.authorShoamanesh, Ashkan-
dc.contributor.authorVenugopalan, Y. V.-
dc.contributor.authorChapman, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMazya, Michael V.-
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorCaso, V.-
dc.contributor.authorHacke, Werner-
dc.contributor.authorBath, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorKoltsov, I.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T20:36:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-16T20:36:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-05-
dc.identifier.citationNeurological Research and Practice, vol. 5, articl. no. 1en_US
dc.identifier.issn25243489-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/27638-
dc.description.abstractPurpose We review key design elements of positive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment and summarize their main characteristics. Method We searched Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for positive RCTs in AIS treatment. Trials were included if (1) they had a randomized controlled design, with (at least partial) blinding for endpoints, (2) they tested against placebo (or on top of standard therapy in a superiority design) or against approved therapy; (3) the protocol was registered and/or published before trial termination and unblinding (if required at study commencement); (4) the primary endpoint was positive in the intention to treat analysis; and (5) the study findings led to approval of the investigational product and/or high ranked recommendations. A topical approach was used, therefore the findings were summarized as a narrative review. Findings Seventeen positive RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The majority of trials included less than 1000 patients (n = 15), had highly selective inclusion criteria (n = 16), used the modified Rankin score as a primary endpoint (n = 15) and had a frequentist design (n = 16). Trials tended to be national (n = 12), investigator-initiated and performed with public funding (n = 11). Discussion Smaller but selective trials are useful to identify efficacy in a particular subgroup of stroke patients. It may also be of advantage to limit the number of participating countries and centers to avoid heterogeneity in stroke management and bureaucratic burden. Conclusion The key characteristics of positive RCTs in AIS treatment described here may assist in the design of further trials investigating a single intervention with a potentially high effect size.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeurological Research and Practiceen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAcute stroke careen_US
dc.subjectAcute stroke therapyen_US
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trialsen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectStroke researchen_US
dc.subjectTrial designen_US
dc.titleKey design elements of successful acute ischemic stroke treatment trialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationAntwerp University Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Antwerpen_US
dc.collaborationMcMaster Universityen_US
dc.collaborationAll India Institute of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Virginiaen_US
dc.collaborationKarolinska University Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationKarolinska Instituteten_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Fribourgen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Perugiaen_US
dc.collaborationRuprechts Karl Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nottinghamen_US
dc.collaborationRussian National Research Medical University named Pirogoven_US
dc.collaborationFederal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologiesen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryBelgiumen_US
dc.countryCanadaen_US
dc.countryIndiaen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countrySwedenen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryRussiaen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42466-022-00221-9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36600257-
dc.relation.volume5en_US
cut.common.academicyear2022-2023en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2524-3489-
crisitem.journal.publisherSpringer Nature-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5310-3017-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Neurological Research and Practice.pdf804.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

240
Last Week
4
Last month
14
checked on May 12, 2024

Download(s)

51
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons