Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23900
Title: Assessment of machine learning and ensemble methods for fault diagnosis of photovoltaic systems
Authors: Mellit, Adel 
Kalogirou, Soteris A. 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Environmental Engineering
Keywords: Ensemble learning;Fault classification;Fault detection;Machine learning;Photovoltaic system
Issue Date: Jan-2022
Source: Renewable Energy, 2022, vol. 184, pp. 1074 - 1090
Volume: 184
Start page: 1074
End page: 1090
Journal: Renewable Energy 
Abstract: The photovoltaic (PV) array is the most sensible element in PV plants, which is subject to different type of faults and defects. Thus, to keep these plants working efficiently they should be monitored and protected carefully. Some faults if they are not detected and isolated promptly they may lead to hazardous risks. The diagnosis of PV systems is widely addressed and recently machine learning (ML) and deep leaning (DL) methods drawn the attention of many researchers. Most applications of ML methods are based on the use of the I–V curves measurement, as enough information and features can be extracted from the curves, to detect and classify faults. These methods showed their capability to classify some faults, like line to line, degradation, disconnected PV modules, partial shading effect, and bypass diode faults. Another approach is based on the use of thermal or electroluminescence images of PV modules/arrays to detect and identify defects, such as hot spot, snails crack, and others. In this paper, different ML and ensemble learning (EL) methods are evaluated for fault diagnosis of PV arrays. The focus is mainly on the detection and classification of some complex faults that may affect the PV arrays, i.e., multiple faults, and faults with similar I–V curves, that are not evaluated before. The results showed the ability of the methods developed to detect faults with very good accuracy (classification rate = number of classified instances/total instances), within 99%, while the classification faults is done with an acceptable accuracy, within 81.73%. Through this study it is shown when really ML and EL methods should be used, and some recommendations, challenges and future directions in this topic are presented.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23900
ISSN: 09601481
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.125
Rights: © Elsevier
Type: Article
Affiliation : University of Jijel 
AS-International Centre of Theoretical Physics 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Cyprus Academy of Science, Letters, and Arts 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

23
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

271
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons