Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23159
Title: | Instruments for patient education: Psychometric evaluation of the expected knowledge (EKHP) and the received knowledge of hospital patients (RKHP) | Authors: | Leino-Kilpi, Helena Inkeroinen, Saija Cabrera, Esther Charalambous, Andreas Fatkulina, Natalja Katajisto, Jouko K. Sigurdardottir, Árún K. Sourtzi, Panayota Suhonen, Riitta A. Zabalegui-Yárnoz, Adelaida Valkeapää, Kirsi |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Health Sciences | Keywords: | Empowerment;Nursing;Patient education as topic;Patient participation;Patient-centered care;Surveys and questionnaires | Issue Date: | 2020 | Source: | Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2020, vol. 13, pp. 1481 - 1505 | Volume: | 13 | Start page: | 1481 | End page: | 1505 | Journal: | Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare | Abstract: | Purpose: In patient education, there is a need for valid and reliable instruments to assess and tailor empowering educational activities. In this study, we summarize the process of producing two parallel instruments for analyzing hospital patients’ expectations (Expected Knowledge of Hospital Patients, EKhp) and received knowledge (Received Knowledge of Hospital Patients, RKhp) and evaluate the psychometrics of the instruments based on international data. In the instruments, six elements of empowering knowledge are included (bio-physiological, functional, experiential, ethical, social, and financial). Patients and Methods: The original Finnish versions of EKhp and RKhp were tested for the first time in 2003, after which they have been used in several national studies. For international purposes, the instruments were first translated into English, then to languages of the seven participating European countries, using double-checking procedure in each one, and subsequently evaluated and confirmed by local researchers and language experts. International data collection was performed in 2009–2012 with a total sample of 1,595 orthopedic patients. Orthopedic patients were selected due to the increase in their numbers, and need for educational activities. Here we report the psychometrics of the instruments for potential international use and future development. Results: Content validities were confirmed by each participating country. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original theoretical, six-dimensional structure of the instruments. For some subscales, however, there is a need for further clarification. The summative factors, based on the dimensions, have a satisfactory internal consistency. The results support the use of the instruments in patient education in orthopedic nursing, and preferably also in other fields of surgical nursing care. Conclusion: EKhp and RKhp have potential for international use in the evaluation of empowering patient education. In the future, testing of the structure is needed, and validation in other fields of clinical care besides surgical nursing is especially warranted. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23159 | ISSN: | 11782390 | DOI: | 10.2147/JMDH.S271043 | Rights: | © Leino-Kilpi et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution. | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | University of Turku Turku University Hospital University of Pompeu Fabra Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University Cyprus University of Technology Klaipeda University Vilnius University University of Akureyri Akureyri Hospital National and Kapodistrian University of Athens City of Turku Welfare Division Hospital Clinic Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Finnish Defense Research Agency |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
jmdh-271043-instruments-for-patient-education-psychometric-evaluation-o.pdf | 774.59 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Feb 2, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
2
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s) 50
311
Last Week
1
1
Last month
6
6
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Download(s)
179
checked on Dec 3, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License