Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23063
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMichael, Costas-
dc.contributor.authorGil, Emilio-
dc.contributor.authorGallart, Montserrat-
dc.contributor.authorStavrinides, Menelaos-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T11:08:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-16T11:08:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationAgriculture, 2020, vol. 10, no. 12, articl. no. 615en_US
dc.identifier.issn20770472-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23063-
dc.description.abstractLeaf deposit and ground losses generated from spray application in mountain viticulture were evaluated. Four treatments were examined: A spray gun (1000 L ha−1, High-Volume Sprayer—HVS), a motorized knapsack sprayer (200 L ha−1, Low Volume Sprayer—LVS), and a conventional orchard mist blower calibrated at 500 L ha−1 (OS500) or 250 L ha−1 (OS250). The four treatments were assessed using the same tank concentration of tracer in two training systems: a trellis and a goblet. Sprayer treatment, vine side, and vine height significantly affected leaf deposit (p < 0.05). The absolute amount of leaf deposit increased with application volume, but when the amount of deposit was standardized to 1 kg ha−1, LVS resulted in the highest deposit, followed by HVS, OS250, and OS500. Deposition for the goblet system was ca. half that for the trellised vineyard. Ground losses standardized to 1 kg of tracer ha−1 were twice as high for HVS than for LVS, and four times as high for HVS than for OS250 and OS500, in both training systems. The current work suggests that low volume applications in vineyards are a viable and more environmentally friendly alternative than high volume treatments.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgricultureen_US
dc.rights© by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectVolume rateen_US
dc.subjectSpray depositionen_US
dc.subjectLosses to the grounden_US
dc.subjectViticultureen_US
dc.titleInfluence of spray technology and application rate on leaf deposit and ground losses in mountain viticultureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunyaen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgriculture Forestry and Fisheriesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agriculture10120615en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097376419-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85097376419-
dc.relation.issue12en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6459-1941-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
agriculture-10-00615.pdfFulltext2.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
agriculture-10-00615-s001.pdfSupplement186.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

227
Last Week
1
Last month
11
checked on May 10, 2024

Download(s) 10

202
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons