Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22758
Title: | A pilot randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effects of the topical application of pyridoxine on palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) induced by capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) | Authors: | Charalambous, Andreas Tsitsi, Theologia Astras, George Paikousis, Lefkios Filippou, Elena |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Clinical Medicine | Keywords: | Capecitabine;Hand-foot syndrome;Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia;Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin;Quality of life;Symptom management | Issue Date: | Feb-2021 | Source: | European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 2021, vol. 50, articl. no. 101866 | Volume: | 50 | Journal: | European Journal of Oncology Nursing | Abstract: | Purpose: Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is a dose-limiting adverse event that commonly occurs with capecitabine and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin-PLD treatment. The study aimed to test the effectiveness of a Pyridoxine (B6) treatment protocol in the management of PPE in patients receiving treatment with capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Methods: This was a pilot randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients receiving capecitabine or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with PPE grade 1 or above were randomly allocated to receive pyridoxine or placebo. The PPE grade, Quality of Life-QoL, Pain and patients’ activities of daily living were assessed. Results: Thirty patients were assigned in the Control and 24 in the Intervention group. No statistically significant difference was found in the PPE grade between baseline and week 6 in the 2 groups (p = 0.263). The control group exhibited worst PPE-associated QoL and higher PAIN levels between baseline and week 6. Respectively, the intervention group showed improved PPE-associated QoL and lower PAIN levels. At week 6, the ECOG status in the Intervention group was improved compared to the control (p = 0.018). Patients in the Intervention group experienced better Global Health Status (p = 0.012), Physical (p = 0.003), Emotional (p = 0.008), and Social function (p < 0.001), lower Fatigue (p = 0.001) and Pain (p = 0.006) compared to Control. Conclusion: Topical pyridoxine was not shown to have an effect on the treatment of PPE. However, results demonstrated its effectiveness on health related QoL, QoL-associated with PPE and pain levels. Due to the high attrition rate further validation of these results in a larger population is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02625415. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22758 | ISSN: | 14623889 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101866 | Rights: | © Elsevier Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Cyprus University of Technology University of Turku American Medical Center Improvast |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
4
checked on Feb 2, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s)
308
Last Week
1
1
Last month
2
2
checked on Jan 3, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License