Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19488
Title: | Residential Buildings’ Foundations as a Ground Heat Exchanger and Comparison among Different Types in a Moderate Climate Country | Authors: | Aresti, Lazaros Christodoulides, Paul Panayiotou, Gregoris Florides, Georgios A. |
Major Field of Science: | Engineering and Technology | Field Category: | Electrical Engineering - Electronic Engineering - Information Engineering | Keywords: | Ground heat exchanger;Thermo active structures;Energy geo structures;Foundation bed GHE;Foundation GHE;Energy piles | Issue Date: | 28-Nov-2020 | Source: | Energies, vol. 13, iss. 23, 2020 | Volume: | 13 | Issue: | 23 | Journal: | Energies | Abstract: | Shallow Geothermal Energy Systems (SGESs) constitute Renewable Energy Systems (RES), which find application in the residential sector through the use of Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs). GSHPs are associated with Ground Heat Exchangers (GHEs), whereby heat is gained/lost through a network of tubes into the ground. GSHPs have failed to flourish in the RES market due to their high initial costs and long payback periods. In this study, the use of Energy Geo-Structure (EGS) systems, namely, the foundation (or energy) piles and the foundation bed of a residential building in Cyprus, was computationally modeled in the COMSOL Multiphysics software. First, the single-houses’ trend in number of units and area in Cyprus was examined and a theoretically typical house with nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) characteristics was considered. The heating and cooling loads were estimated in the TRNSYS software environment and used as inputs to investigate the performance of the GSHP/GHE systems. Both systems were shown to exhibit steady performance and high Coefficient of Performance (COP) values, making them an alternative RES solution for residential building integration. Next, the systems were economically evaluated through a comparison with a convectional Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) system. The economic analysis showed that the cost of the suggested conversions of the foundation elements into GHEs had short payback periods. Consequently, either using the foundation piles or bed as a GHE is a profitable investment and an alternative to conventional RES. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19488 | ISSN: | 19961073 | DOI: | 10.3390/en13236287 | Rights: | © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license Attribution 4.0 International |
Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Cyprus University of Technology | Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
energies-13-06287-v3.pdf | Open Access | 2.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
5
checked on Nov 6, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
4
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s) 50
341
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Download(s)
233
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License