Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18898
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChristodoulou, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.authorPantelidis, Lysandros-
dc.contributor.authorGravanis, Elias-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T09:02:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-09T09:02:28Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-
dc.identifier.citationGeosciences, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, articl. no. 110en_US
dc.identifier.issn20763263-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18898-
dc.descriptionThe article was funded by the “CUT Open Access Author Fund”en_US
dc.description.abstractIn one of their recent works, the authors examined parametrically the e ect of targeted field investigation on reducing statistical uncertainty in active state analysis of earth retaining structures based on 2165 di erent cases for each of the sliding and overturning modes of failure. This analysis indicates that the optimal sampling location is always adjacent to the wall, while a sampling domain length equal to the whole height of the wall is suggested to be considered. The present paper deals with the “symmetrical” problem of soil under the passive state of stresses. Working in a similar manner, 1879 passive state cases have been considered (also for each of the sliding and overturning modes of failure) in a Random Finite Element Method (RFEM) analysis framework, where soil properties are modeled as random fields while measurements are modeled by sampling from di erent points of the field domain. The “actual” resultant earth passive pressure force (or moment) exerted by the random soil on the retaining wall is compared against the respective “predicted” one calculated using the soil property values sampled from the random field. Failure is considered to have occurred when the derived “actual” force is smaller than the respective “predicted” force. This analysis clearly indicates that the passive state constitutes a di erent problem, where the optimal sampling distance from the wall is half the wall height. Regarding the depth of exploration, it was again found to be the entire wall height. In addition, the present analysis shows that, the benefit from a targeted field investigation is much greater than the benefit gained using statistical methods for obtaining cautious estimates for the various soil properties; the latter refers to the “characteristic value”, a concept commonly used in the Limit State analysis framework of Eurocode 7.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeosciencesen_US
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licenseen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectProbabilistic analysisen_US
dc.subjectSoil sampling locationen_US
dc.subjectRandom Finite Element Methoden_US
dc.subjectScale of fluctuationen_US
dc.subjectPassive earth pressureen_US
dc.subjectOptimal sampling locationen_US
dc.subjectCharacteristic valueen_US
dc.titleThe effect of targeted field investigation on the reliability of earth-retaining structures in passive state: A random field approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/geosciences10030110en_US
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2019-2020en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2076-3263-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5979-6937-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5331-6661-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
geosciences-10-00110-v2.pdfFulltext8.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

332
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

126
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons