Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/11852
Title: | Imageability ratings across languages | Authors: | Rofes, Adrià Zakariás, Lilla Ceder, Klaudia Lind, Marianne Johansson, Monica Blom De Aguiar, Vânia Bjekić, Jovana Fyndanis, Valantis Gavarró, Anna Simonsen, Hanne Gram Sacristán, Carlos Hernández Kambanaros, Maria Kraljević, Jelena Kuvač Martínez-Ferreiro, Silvia Mavis, İlknur Orellana, Carolina Méndez Sör, Ingrid Lukács, Ágnes Tunçer, Müge Vuksanović, Jasmina Ibarrola, Amaia Munarriz Pourquie, Marie Varlokosta, Spyridoula Howard, David |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Clinical Medicine | Keywords: | Correlations;Cross-linguistic;Imageability;Linguistics | Issue Date: | 1-Jun-2018 | Source: | Behavior Research Methods, 2018, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1187-1197 | Volume: | 50 | Issue: | 3 | Start page: | 1187 | End page: | 1197 | Journal: | Behavior research methods | Abstract: | Imageability is a psycholinguistic variable that indicates how well a word gives rise to a mental image or sensory experience. Imageability ratings are used extensively in psycholinguistic, neuropsychological, and aphasiological studies. However, little formal knowledge exists about whether and how these ratings are associated between and within languages. Fifteen imageability databases were cross-correlated using nonparametric statistics. Some of these corresponded to unpublished data collected within a European research network—the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (COST IS1208). All but four of the correlations were significant. The average strength of the correlations (rho = .68) and the variance explained (R 2 = 46%) were moderate. This implies that factors other than imageability may explain 54% of the results. Imageability ratings often correlate across languages. Different possibly interacting factors may explain the moderate strength and variance explained in the correlations: (1) linguistic and cultural factors; (2) intrinsic differences between the databases; (3) range effects; (4) small numbers of words in each database, equivalent words, and participants; and (5) mean age of the participants. The results suggest that imageability ratings may be used cross-linguistically. However, further understanding of the factors explaining the variance in the correlations will be needed before research and practical recommendations can be made. | ISSN: | 1554351X | DOI: | 10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0 | Rights: | © Psychonomic Society, Inc. | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Trinity College Dublin University of Potsdam Uppsala University University of Oslo Statped University of Belgrade Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Universitat de València Cyprus University of Technology University of Zagreb University of Copenhagen Anadolu University Universidad Católica de Chile Budapest University of Technology and Economics University of the Basque Country Basque Center on Cognition Brain and Language National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Newcastle University |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
29
checked on Nov 6, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
50
29
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s) 50
392
Last Week
0
0
Last month
5
5
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.