Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/11852
Title: Imageability ratings across languages
Authors: Rofes, Adrià 
Zakariás, Lilla 
Ceder, Klaudia 
Lind, Marianne 
Johansson, Monica Blom 
De Aguiar, Vânia 
Bjekić, Jovana 
Fyndanis, Valantis 
Gavarró, Anna 
Simonsen, Hanne Gram 
Sacristán, Carlos Hernández 
Kambanaros, Maria 
Kraljević, Jelena Kuvač 
Martínez-Ferreiro, Silvia 
Mavis, İlknur 
Orellana, Carolina Méndez 
Sör, Ingrid 
Lukács, Ágnes 
Tunçer, Müge 
Vuksanović, Jasmina 
Ibarrola, Amaia Munarriz 
Pourquie, Marie 
Varlokosta, Spyridoula 
Howard, David 
Major Field of Science: Medical and Health Sciences
Field Category: Clinical Medicine
Keywords: Correlations;Cross-linguistic;Imageability;Linguistics
Issue Date: 1-Jun-2018
Source: Behavior Research Methods, 2018, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1187-1197
Volume: 50
Issue: 3
Start page: 1187
End page: 1197
Journal: Behavior research methods 
Abstract: Imageability is a psycholinguistic variable that indicates how well a word gives rise to a mental image or sensory experience. Imageability ratings are used extensively in psycholinguistic, neuropsychological, and aphasiological studies. However, little formal knowledge exists about whether and how these ratings are associated between and within languages. Fifteen imageability databases were cross-correlated using nonparametric statistics. Some of these corresponded to unpublished data collected within a European research network—the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (COST IS1208). All but four of the correlations were significant. The average strength of the correlations (rho = .68) and the variance explained (R 2 = 46%) were moderate. This implies that factors other than imageability may explain 54% of the results. Imageability ratings often correlate across languages. Different possibly interacting factors may explain the moderate strength and variance explained in the correlations: (1) linguistic and cultural factors; (2) intrinsic differences between the databases; (3) range effects; (4) small numbers of words in each database, equivalent words, and participants; and (5) mean age of the participants. The results suggest that imageability ratings may be used cross-linguistically. However, further understanding of the factors explaining the variance in the correlations will be needed before research and practical recommendations can be made.
ISSN: 1554351X
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0
Rights: © Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Type: Article
Affiliation : Trinity College Dublin 
University of Potsdam 
Uppsala University 
University of Oslo 
Statped 
University of Belgrade 
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 
Universitat de València 
Cyprus University of Technology 
University of Zagreb 
University of Copenhagen 
Anadolu University 
Universidad Católica de Chile 
Budapest University of Technology and Economics 
University of the Basque Country 
Basque Center on Cognition Brain and Language 
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens 
Newcastle University 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

29
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

392
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.