Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/11852
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRofes, Adrià-
dc.contributor.authorZakariás, Lilla-
dc.contributor.authorCeder, Klaudia-
dc.contributor.authorLind, Marianne-
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Monica Blom-
dc.contributor.authorDe Aguiar, Vânia-
dc.contributor.authorBjekić, Jovana-
dc.contributor.authorFyndanis, Valantis-
dc.contributor.authorGavarró, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorSimonsen, Hanne Gram-
dc.contributor.authorSacristán, Carlos Hernández-
dc.contributor.authorKambanaros, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorKraljević, Jelena Kuvač-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Ferreiro, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorMavis, İlknur-
dc.contributor.authorOrellana, Carolina Méndez-
dc.contributor.authorSör, Ingrid-
dc.contributor.authorLukács, Ágnes-
dc.contributor.authorTunçer, Müge-
dc.contributor.authorVuksanović, Jasmina-
dc.contributor.authorIbarrola, Amaia Munarriz-
dc.contributor.authorPourquie, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorVarlokosta, Spyridoula-
dc.contributor.authorHoward, David-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T05:39:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-09T05:39:43Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationBehavior Research Methods, 2018, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1187-1197en_US
dc.identifier.issn1554351X-
dc.description.abstractImageability is a psycholinguistic variable that indicates how well a word gives rise to a mental image or sensory experience. Imageability ratings are used extensively in psycholinguistic, neuropsychological, and aphasiological studies. However, little formal knowledge exists about whether and how these ratings are associated between and within languages. Fifteen imageability databases were cross-correlated using nonparametric statistics. Some of these corresponded to unpublished data collected within a European research network—the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (COST IS1208). All but four of the correlations were significant. The average strength of the correlations (rho = .68) and the variance explained (R 2 = 46%) were moderate. This implies that factors other than imageability may explain 54% of the results. Imageability ratings often correlate across languages. Different possibly interacting factors may explain the moderate strength and variance explained in the correlations: (1) linguistic and cultural factors; (2) intrinsic differences between the databases; (3) range effects; (4) small numbers of words in each database, equivalent words, and participants; and (5) mean age of the participants. The results suggest that imageability ratings may be used cross-linguistically. However, further understanding of the factors explaining the variance in the correlations will be needed before research and practical recommendations can be made.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBehavior research methodsen_US
dc.rights© Psychonomic Society, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectCorrelationsen_US
dc.subjectCross-linguisticen_US
dc.subjectImageabilityen_US
dc.subjectLinguisticsen_US
dc.titleImageability ratings across languagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationTrinity College Dublinen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Potsdamen_US
dc.collaborationUppsala Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Osloen_US
dc.collaborationStatpeden_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Belgradeen_US
dc.collaborationUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelonaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversitat de Valènciaen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Zagreben_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Copenhagenen_US
dc.collaborationAnadolu Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversidad Católica de Chileen_US
dc.collaborationBudapest University of Technology and Economicsen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of the Basque Countryen_US
dc.collaborationBasque Center on Cognition Brain and Languageen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationNewcastle Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryIrelanden_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countrySwedenen_US
dc.countryNorwayen_US
dc.countrySerbiaen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryCroatiaen_US
dc.countryDenmarken_US
dc.countryTurkeyen_US
dc.countryChileen_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0en_US
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume50en_US
cut.common.academicyear2017-2018en_US
dc.identifier.spage1187en_US
dc.identifier.epage1197en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9403-3468-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5857-9460-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1554-3528-
crisitem.journal.publisherSpringer Nature-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

29
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

395
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Jan 29, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.