Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1087
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPapatheodorou, Stefania-
dc.contributor.authorMakrydimas, George V.-
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, John P. A.-
dc.contributor.authorEvangelou, Evangelos-
dc.contributor.otherΠαπαθεοδώρου, Στεφανία-
dc.contributor.otherΕυαγγέλου, Ευάγγελος-
dc.contributor.otherΜακρυδήμας, Γεώργιος-
dc.contributor.otherΙωαννίδης, Ιωάνννης Π. Α.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-20T07:07:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:48:33Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-20T07:07:24Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:48:33Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-
dc.identifier.citationObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2012, vol.67, no.3, pp.148–149en_US
dc.identifier.issn15339866-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1087-
dc.description.abstractCardiac defects, the most common form of congenital anomaly, are found in 2–8 of every 1000 pregnancies. Increased nuchal translucency (NT) on ultrasound is an established marker for first-trimester detection of congenital heart defects (CHDs), with or without structural anomalies, in chromosomally normal and abnormal fetuses. However, due to modest sensitivity and specificity, many fetuses with increased NT who do not have CHD may undergo detailed cardiac scans. Moreover, NT screening may miss some fetuses with CHD and normal karyotype. Ductus venosus (DV) Doppler waveform has been investigated to improve the diagnostic discrimination of ultrasound among cardiac anomalies in chromosomally abnormal and normal fetuses. DV has shown variable results in several studies in fetuses with normal karyotype; its value for identifying fetuses with CHD in the setting of a normal versus an increased NT is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of first-trimester DV for detection of CHD in chromosomally normal fetuses. A search of MEDLINE, ISI, SCOPUS, and EMBASE was performed for studies published between 1999 and 2011. Key words included “ductus venosus,” “DV,” “chromosomal abnormalities,” “congenital heart disease,” and “nuchal translucency.” The diagnostic accuracy of DV was examined in 7 studies involving 50,354 fetuses with normal karyotype regardless of NT status, 9 studies including 2908 fetuses with increased NT, and 7 studies involving 47,610 fetuses with normal NT. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn based on parameters of the fitted models. Analysis of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the sensitivity and specificity of DV to detect CHD in the normal karyotype population regardless of the NT status were 0.50 and 0.93, respectively. Summary sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 80% among participants with increased NT, and 19% and 96% among those with normal NT, respectively. The findings of this meta-analysis showing the estimated performance of DV for detecting CHD in chromosomally normal fetuses should be considered in evaluating the potential use of this screening test and its limitations.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofObstetrical & Gynecological Surveyen_US
dc.rights© Lippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectChromosome aberrationen_US
dc.subjectCongenital heart malformationen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic accuracyen_US
dc.subjectDuctus venosusen_US
dc.subjectEchographyen_US
dc.subjectFirst trimester pregnancyen_US
dc.subjectKaryotypeen_US
dc.subjectNuchal translucency measurementen_US
dc.titleFirst-trimester Ductus Venosus Screening for Cardiac Defects: a Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.linkhttp://journals.lww.com/obgynsurvey/Abstract/2012/03000/First_Trimester_Ductus_Venosus_Screening_for.7.aspxen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Ioanninaen_US
dc.collaborationStanford Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.reviewPeer Revieweden
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryUSAen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume67en_US
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
dc.identifier.spage148en_US
dc.identifier.epage149en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptCyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9451-9094-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

428
Last Week
3
Last month
16
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons