Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10505
Τίτλος: | The locus preservation hypothesis: Shared linguistic profiles across developmental disorders and the resilient part of the human language faculty | Συγγραφείς: | Leivada, Evelina Kambanaros, Maria Grohmann, Kleanthes K. |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Clinical Medicine | Λέξεις-κλειδιά: | Distributed morphology;Grammatical marker;Linguistic phenotype;Syntax;Autism spectrum disorders (ASD);Down Syndrome;Specific language impairment (SLI) | Ημερομηνία Έκδοσης: | 13-Οκτ-2017 | Πηγή: | Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, no. OCT | Volume: | 8 | Issue: | OCT | Περιοδικό: | Frontiers in Psychology | Περίληψη: | Grammatical markers are not uniformly impaired across speakers of different languages, even when speakers share a diagnosis and the marker in question is grammaticalized in a similar way in these languages. The aim of this work is to demarcate, from a cross-linguistic perspective, the linguistic phenotype of three genetically heterogeneous developmental disorders: specific language impairment, Down syndrome, and autism spectrum disorder. After a systematic review of linguistic profiles targeting mainly English-, Greek-, Catalan-, and Spanish-speaking populations with developmental disorders (n = 880), shared loci of impairment are identified and certain domains of grammar are shown to be more vulnerable than others. The distribution of impaired loci is captured by the Locus Preservation Hypothesis which suggests that specific parts of the language faculty are immune to impairment across developmental disorders. Through the Locus Preservation Hypothesis, a classical chicken and egg question can be addressed: Do poor conceptual resources and memory limitations result in an atypical grammar or does a grammatical breakdown lead to conceptual and memory limitations? Overall, certain morphological markers reveal themselves as highly susceptible to impairment, while syntactic operations are preserved, granting support to the first scenario. The origin of resilient syntax is explained from a phylogenetic perspective in connection to the "syntax-before-phonology" hypothesis. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10505 | ISSN: | 16641078 | DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01765 | Rights: | © Leivada, Kambanaros and Grohmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | Type: | Article | Affiliation: | Cyprus University of Technology University of Cyprus UiT The Arctic University of Norway |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Εμφανίζεται στις συλλογές: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο:
Αρχείο | Περιγραφή | Μέγεθος | Μορφότυπος | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leivada Kambanaros Grohmann.pdf | 980.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Δείτε/ Ανοίξτε |
CORE Recommender
Όλα τα τεκμήρια του δικτυακού τόπου προστατεύονται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα