Παρακαλώ χρησιμοποιήστε αυτό το αναγνωριστικό για να παραπέμψετε ή να δημιουργήσετε σύνδεσμο προς αυτό το τεκμήριο: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9541
Πεδίο DCΤιμήΓλώσσα
dc.contributor.authorAntoniades, Athos-
dc.contributor.authorNicolaidou, Iolie-
dc.contributor.authorSpachos, Dimitris-
dc.contributor.authorMylläri, Jarkko-
dc.contributor.authorGiordano, Daniela-
dc.contributor.authorDafli, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorMitsopoulou, Evangelia-
dc.contributor.authorSchizas, Christos N.-
dc.contributor.authorNikolaidou, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorBamidis, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.authorPattichis, Constantinos S.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-08T15:38:02Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-08T15:38:02Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2015, Volume 17, Issue 10, Article number e229en_US
dc.identifier.issn14388871-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9541-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The mEducator Best Practice Network (BPN) implemented and extended standards and reference models in e-learning to develop innovative frameworks as well as solutions that enable specialized state-of-the-art medical educational content to be discovered, retrieved, shared, and re-purposed across European Institutions, targeting medical students, doctors, educators and health care professionals. Scenario-based evaluation for usability testing, complemented with data from online questionnaires and field notes of users' performance, was designed and utilized for the evaluation of these solutions. Objective: The objective of this work is twofold: (1) to describe one instantiation of the mEducator BPN solutions (mEducator3.0-"MEdical Education LINnked Arena" MELINA+) with a focus on the metadata schema used, as well as on other aspects of the system that pertain to usability and acceptance, and (2) to present evaluation results on the suitability of the proposed metadata schema for searching, retrieving, and sharing of medical content and with respect to the overall usability and acceptance of the system from the target users. Methods: A comprehensive evaluation methodology framework was developed and applied to four case studies, which were conducted in four different countries (ie, Greece, Cyprus, Bulgaria and Romania), with a total of 126 participants. In these case studies, scenarios referring to creating, sharing, and retrieving medical educational content using mEducator3.0 were used. The data were collected through two online questionnaires, consisting of 36 closed-ended questions and two open-ended questions that referred to mEducator 3.0 and through the use of field notes during scenario-based evaluations. Results: The main findings of the study showed that even though the informational needs of the mEducator target groups were addressed to a satisfactory extent and the metadata schema supported content creation, sharing, and retrieval from an end-user perspective, users faced difficulties in achieving a shared understanding of the meaning of some metadata fields and in correctly managing the intellectual property rights of repurposed content. Conclusions: The results of this evaluation impact researchers, medical professionals, and designers interested in using similar systems for educational content sharing in medical and other domains. Recommendations on how to improve the search, retrieval, identification, and obtaining of medical resources are provided, by addressing issues of content description metadata, content description procedures, and intellectual property rights for re-purposed content.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© Athos Antoniades, Iolie Nicolaidou, Dimitris Spachos, Jarkko Mylläri, Daniela Giordano, Eleni Dafli, Evangelia Mitsopoulou, Christos N Schizas, Constantinos Pattichis, Maria Nikolaidou, Panagiotis Bamidis.en_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectMetadataen_US
dc.subjectRepurposingen_US
dc.subjectSearching and sharing of medical educational contenten_US
dc.titleMedical content searching, retrieving, and sharing over the internet: Lessons learned from the meducator through a scenario-based evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.doi10.2196/jmir.3650en_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cyprusen_US
dc.collaborationSTREMBLE Ventures Ltden_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Helsinkien_US
dc.collaborationUniversita' di Cataniaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8267-0328-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Εμφανίζεται στις συλλογές:Άρθρα/Articles
Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο:
Αρχείο Περιγραφή ΜέγεθοςΜορφότυπος
Nicolaidou.pdfArticle1.3 MBAdobe PDFΔείτε/ Ανοίξτε
CORE Recommender
Δείξε τη σύντομη περιγραφή του τεκμηρίου

Page view(s) 50

420
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on 5 Οκτ 2024

Download(s) 50

334
checked on 5 Οκτ 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Όλα τα τεκμήρια του δικτυακού τόπου προστατεύονται από πνευματικά δικαιώματα