Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9529
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArgyra, Erifili-
dc.contributor.authorMoka, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorStaikou, Chryssoula-
dc.contributor.authorVadalouca, Athina-
dc.contributor.authorRaftopoulos, Vasilios-
dc.contributor.authorStavropoulou, Evmorfia-
dc.contributor.authorGambopoulou, Zoi-
dc.contributor.authorSiafaka, Ioanna-
dc.contributor.otherΡαφτόπουλος, Βασίλειος-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-08T08:51:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-08T08:51:41Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 2015, Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 59-66en_US
dc.identifier.issn09709185-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9529-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: Regional anesthesia (RA) techniques (central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks [CNBs and PNBs]) are well-established anesthesia/analgesia modalities. However, information on their nationwide use is sparse. The aim of the survey was to assess the utility of RA techniques in Greece, during 2011. Materials and Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted (March to June, 2012), using a structured questionnaire that was sent to 128 Greek Anesthesia Departments. Results: Sixty-six completed questionnaires (response rate 51.56%) were analyzed. The data corresponded to 187,703 operations and represented all hospital categories and geographical regions of Greece. On the whole, RA was used in 45.5% of performed surgical procedures (85,386/187,703). Spinal anesthesia was the technique of choice (51.9% of all RA techniques), mostly preferred in orthopedics (44.8%). Epidural anesthesia/analgesia (application rate of 23.2%), was mostly used in obstetrics and gynecology (50.4%). Combined spinal-epidural and PNBs were less commonly instituted (11.24% and 13.64% of all RA techniques, respectively). Most PNBs (78.5%) were performed with a neurostimulator, while elicitation of paresthesia was used in 16% of the cases. Conversely, ultrasound guidance was quite limited (5%). The vast majority of consultant anesthesologists (94.49%) were familiar with CNBs, whereas only 46.4% were familiar with PNBs. The main reported limitations to RA application were lack of equipment (58.23%) and inadequate education/training (49.29%). Conclusion: Regional modalities were routinely used by Greek anesthesiologists during 2011. Neuraxial blocks, especially spinal anesthesia, were preferred over PNBs. The underutilization of certain RA techniques was attributed to lack of equipment and inadequate training.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCentral neuraxial blocksen_US
dc.subjectEpidural techniqueen_US
dc.subjectPeripheral nerve blocksen_US
dc.subjectRegional anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectSpinal techniqueen_US
dc.titleRegional anesthesia practice in Greece: A census reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.doi10.4103/0970-9185.150545en_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationCreta Interclinic Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationGeneral Hospital ELPISen_US
dc.collaborationGeneral Hospital of Attiki KATen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1042-642X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Raftopoulos.pdfArticle1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

357
Last Week
1
Last month
9
checked on May 11, 2024

Download(s)

110
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.