Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9351
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiadou, Egli C.-
dc.contributor.authorNtourou, Thessaloniki-
dc.contributor.authorGoulas, Vlasios-
dc.contributor.authorManganaris, George A.-
dc.contributor.authorKalaitzis, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.authorFotopoulos, Vasileios-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-01T13:42:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-01T13:42:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-21-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Plant Science, 2015, vol. 6, no. 871en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664462X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9351-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this work was to generate a high resolution temporal mapping of the biosynthetic pathway of vitamin E in olive fruit (Olea europaea cv. “Koroneiki”) during 17 successive on-tree developmental stages. Fruit material was collected from the middle of June until the end of January, corresponding to 6–38 weeks after flowering (WAF). Results revealed a variable gene regulation pattern among 6–38 WAF studied and more pronounced levels of differential regulation of gene expression for the first and intermediate genes in the biosynthetic pathway (VTE5, geranylgeranyl reductase, HPPD, VTE2, HGGT and VTE3) compared with the downstream components of the pathway (VTE1 and VTE4). Notably, expression of HGGT and VTE2 genes were significantly suppressed throughout the developmental stages examined. Metabolite analysis indicated that the first and intermediate stages of development (6–22 WAF) have higher concentrations of tocochromanols compared with the last on-tree stages (starting from 24 WAF onwards). The concentration of α-tocopherol (16.15 ± 0.60−32.45 ± 0.54 mg/100 g F.W.) were substantially greater (up to 100-fold) than those of β-, γ-, and δ-tocopherols (0.13 ± 0.01−0.25 ± 0.03 mg/100 g F.W., 0.13 ± 0.01−0.33 ± 0.04 mg/100 g F.W., 0.14 ± 0.01−0.28 ± 0.01 mg/100 g F.W., respectively). In regard with tocotrienol content, only γ-tocotrienol was detected. Overall, olive fruits (cv. “Koroneiki”) exhibited higher concentrations of vitamin E until 22 WAF as compared with later WAF, concomitant with the expression profile of phytol kinase (VTE5), which could be used as a marker gene due to its importance in the biosynthesis of vitamin E. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that explores the complete biosynthetic pathway of vitamin E in a fruit tree crop of great horticultural importance such as olive, linking molecular gene expression analysis with tocochromanol content.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Plant Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2015 Georgiadou, Ntourou, Goulas, Manganaris, Kalaitzis and Fotopoulos.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectOlea europaeaen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental stagesen_US
dc.subjectGene expressionen_US
dc.subjectPhytol kinaseen_US
dc.subjectTocochromanolsen_US
dc.subjectTocopherolsen_US
dc.subjectTocotrienolsen_US
dc.titleTemporal analysis reveals a key role for VTE5 in vitamin E biosynthesis in olive fruit during on-tree developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.doi10.3389/fpls.2015.00871en_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationMediterranean Agronomic Institute Chaniaen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgriculture Forestry and Fisheriesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpls.2015.00871en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26557125-
dc.relation.issue871en_US
dc.relation.volume6en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1664-462X-
crisitem.journal.publisherFrontiers-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5073-979X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7527-1559-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5849-6104-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1205-2070-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Georgiadou.pdfArticle3.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

18
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

402
Last Week
4
Last month
12
checked on May 13, 2024

Download(s)

111
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons