Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9347
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKambanaros, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMessinis, Lambros-
dc.contributor.authorNasios, Grigorios-
dc.contributor.authorNousia, Anastasia-
dc.contributor.authorPapathanasopoulos, Panagiotis G.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T12:51:49Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-31T12:51:49Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-02-
dc.identifier.citationAphasiology ,2 January 2017,vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49-66en_US
dc.identifier.issn02687038-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9347-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The last two decades have afforded a small but steady rise in the number of studies exposing language dysfunctions in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), the most common form of multiple sclerosis however, not much is known about word class naming deficits in this group of individuals. Aim: To explore whether individuals with RRMS show word class naming deficits favouring either nouns or verbs, and if verb accuracy is affected by semantic and phonological verb type. Method: A total of 31 adults with RRMS were compared to 28 demographically matched healthy controls on noun and verb production using the Greek Object and Action Test (GOAT), a picture-based assessment developed for this purpose. Different semantic categories of verbs were investigated such as conceptually/semantically “heavy” verbs (i.e., instrumental verbs, e.g., “sweeping”) compared to conceptually/semantically “weaker” verbs (i.e., non-instrumental verbs (NIVs), e.g., “sleeping”) and instrumental verbs that were phonologically related to a noun (i.e., name-related instrumental verbs, e.g., “mopping”). Outcome & results: Verbs were significantly more difficult to retrieve than nouns for the RRMS group on production tasks compared to the demographic and intelligence matched healthy participants. Moreover, there was a significant difference between instrumental and NIV production with instrumental verbs more difficult to retrieve than NIVs. In regard to phonological relatedness, non-name-related instrumental verbs were significantly more difficult to retrieve than name-related instrumental verbs. Multiple regression analyses conducted as a separate model for verbs and nouns indicated that performance on the GOAT could not be explained by any of the predictor variables (demographic, clinical, or neurocognitive performance). Conclusion: Based on the results, the grammatical distinction for Greek verbs and nouns seems to be preserved in this group of individuals with RRMS. The naming deficit is probably in the connection between the semantic lexicon and the phonological lexicon. In the case of verbs, the magnitude of the difficulty was larger because of the effects of word frequency on verb retrieval. Overall, poor performance on verb and noun naming may be a marker of incipient cognitive decline, and typical cognitive-linguistic testing is not sensitive or specific enough to capture this phenomenon.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAphasiologyen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectAnomiaen_US
dc.subjectInstrumentalityen_US
dc.subjectNaming impairmenten_US
dc.subjectNoun–name relationen_US
dc.subjectWord class deficitsen_US
dc.titleVerb–noun dissociations in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: verb effects of semantic complexity and phonological relatednessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Patrasen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Ioanninaen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687038.2016.1154498en_US
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume31en_US
cut.common.academicyear2016-2017en_US
dc.identifier.spage49en_US
dc.identifier.epage66en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0268-7038-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5857-9460-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

9
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

400
Last Week
1
Last month
11
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.