Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9262
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDrogoudi, Pavlina D.-
dc.contributor.authorPantelidis, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorGoulas, Vlasios-
dc.contributor.authorManganaris, George A.-
dc.contributor.authorZiogas, Vasileios-
dc.contributor.authorManganaris, Athanasios G.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-26T11:40:25Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-26T11:40:25Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationPostharvest Biology and Technology, 2016, vol. 115, pp. 142-150en_US
dc.identifier.issn09255214-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9262-
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies document that peach and nectarine ripening related parameters can be efficiently predicted in a non-destructive manner; however, such studies are being restricted in a relatively limited number of cultivars and parameters measured. In addition, the combined effect of genotype and postharvest ripening on phytochemical content of peach and nectarines has not been elucidated. In the present study, the IAD maturity index, ripening-related parameters, phenolic and flavonoid contents and in vitro antioxidant capacity were determined in fruit from 26 commercially important peach and nectarine cultivars, grown in Greece. Analyses were carried out at harvest and after additional ripening at room temperature (~23±2 °C) for 1, 3 and 5 days, to simulate shelf life conditions. Results indicated great variation in the IAD index (variation coefficient=32%); this index can be used as reference in future studies on a cultivar basis. Flesh firmness was the strongest predicted parameter from the IAD index during off-tree ripening. Segregation of peach and nectarine cultivars revealed great differences on quality parameters and on their ripening behavior. Varietal differences were more pronounced regarding the polyphenolic content; indicatively, total phenol (TP) content ranged from 11.7 to 90.1mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) 100-1g fresh weight (FW) at harvest. 'Sun Cloud' and 'Gladys' fruits among peach cultivars and 'Tasty Free' fruits among nectarine cultivars demonstrated high antioxidant contents. Interestingly, postharvest ripening of peach and nectarine cultivars did not seem to affect polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity in a constant mode. Hence IAD was not correlated with antioxidant contents and to our knowledge this is the first work examining this correlation. Furthermore, data underlines that peach cultivars in general were characterized by higher antioxidant contents compared to nectarine cultivars; this was also the case for late-harvested cultivars versus the early-harvested ones.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPostharvest Biology and Technologyen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectFlavanolsen_US
dc.subjectIAD indexen_US
dc.subjectNon-destructiveen_US
dc.subjectPhenolic compoundsen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.subjectShelf-lifeen_US
dc.titleThe appraisal of qualitative parameters and antioxidant contents during postharvest peach fruit ripening underlines the genotype significanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationHellenic Agricultural Organization “Demeter”en_US
dc.collaborationInternational Hellenic Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEarth and Related Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.002en_US
dc.relation.volume115en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.spage142en_US
dc.identifier.epage150en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0925-5214-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7527-1559-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5849-6104-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

35
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 10

488
Last Week
2
Last month
9
checked on May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.