Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9147
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSamouel, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKanetis, Loukas-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-19T11:25:19Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-19T11:25:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-20-
dc.identifier.citationPlant Disease, 2015, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 1867.en_US
dc.identifier.issn01912917-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9147-
dc.description.abstractThe genus Sideritis L. (Lamiaceae) comprises approximately 150 perennial and annual species, mainly in the Mediterranean Basin, and has been used traditionally for culinary and therapeutical purposes (González-Burgos et al. 2011). Medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) constitute a dynamic sector for Cyprus due to the ideal prevailing climatic conditions and the relatively limited required crop resources. Currently, MAPs are grown on approximately 160 ha in Cyprus exported mainly to European markets. During the winter of 2014, 0.4 ha of Sideritis perfoliata plants grown on an organic farm near Nicosia were severely affected by a foliar disease that rendered the crop unmarketable. Symptoms included yellow, spotty discoloration of infected leaves that resulted in wilting and necrosis. Signs resembled those of a powdery mildew. Mycelium was sparse and not easily noticed on the upper leaf area due to the density of trichomes. Conidiophores were hyaline and straight, with 2 to 5 hyaline, doliform conidia that lacked fibrosin bodies and ranged from 35 to 49 μm (mean ± standard deviation of 42 ± 4 μm) × 17 to 25 μm wide (mean = 21 ± 3 μm). Chasmothecia were abundant, partly clustered, yellowish to dark brown, globose, 102 to 203 μm in diameter (157 ± 38 μm) each containing 5 to 8 asci. Numerous hyaline, septate, mycelioid appendages, generally simple and rarely branched, were observed on the chasmothecia. Asci were stalked, kidney-shaped, and ranged from 42 to 90 μm (58 ± 17 μm) × 18 to 35 μm (25 ± 5 μm). No mature ascospores were found on the examined specimens. The microscopic features were consistent with those of Neoerysiphe galeopsidis (DC.) U. Braun (Braun and Cook 2012). For molecular identification, fungal genomic DNA of isolate NG_CY1 was extracted from infected tissue and part of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) region was amplified using primers ITS5 and P3 according to Takamatsu et al. (2009). The PCR product was sequenced. BLAST analysis of the 548-bp fragment (GenBank Accession No. KR006933) showed ≥99% similarity to N. galeopsidis ITS sequences in the NCBI database (AB498942, AB498949, DQ359698, and AB022370). Pathogenicity was confirmed by gently pressing diseased leaves onto leaves of five healthy plants of S. perfoliata. An equal number of noninoculated plants served as control plants. All plants were covered with polyethylene bags for 2 days and incubated in a growth chamber at 24°C, after which they were uncovered and maintained at the same temperature with a 12-h photoperiod. Powdery mildew signs and symptoms were first observed approximately a week later. The fungus that developed was morphologically identical to that observed on the original diseased plants, while no symptoms developed on the control plants, therefore, Koch’s postulates were fulfilled. Although N. galeopsidis has been reported on plants from 12 families, mainly species in the Lamiaceae, and on other Sideritis species (Farr and Rossman 2015, Pastircakova et al. 2008), to our knowledge this is the first report of powdery mildew caused by N. galeopsidis on S. perfoliata in Cyprus.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlant Diseaseen_US
dc.rights© 2015 The American Phytopathological Society.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectSideritis L. (Lamiaceae)en_US
dc.subjectMedicinal and aromatic plantsen_US
dc.titleFirst report of powdery mildew of Sideritis perfoliata caused by Neoerysiphe galeopsidis in Cyprusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.doi10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0343-PDNen_US
dc.collaborationMinistry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Cyprusen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1094/PDIS-03-15-0343-PDNen_US
dc.relation.issue12en_US
dc.relation.volume99en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.spage1867en_US
dc.identifier.epage1867en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1869-558X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1943-7692-
crisitem.journal.publisherAmerican Phytopathological Society-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

439
Last Week
0
Last month
11
checked on Jun 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons