Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9063
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPapastavrou, Evridiki-
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorAndreou, Christos-
dc.contributor.otherΠαπασταύρου, Ευριδίκη-
dc.contributor.otherΑντρέου, Χρίστος-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-16T12:37:23Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-16T12:37:23Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationNursing Ethics, 2016, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 92-103en_US
dc.identifier.issn14770989-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/9063-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Respecting patients’ dignity has been described as a fundamental part of nursing care. Many studies have focused on exploring the concept of patients’ dignity from the patient and nurse perspective, but knowledge is limited regarding students’ nursing perceptions and experiences. Objective: To explore the issue of patients’ dignity from the perspective of nursing students. Research design: A qualitative study was employed with the formation of four focus groups and the participation of nursing students. Data were analysed via a thematic content analysis of the discussions. Participants and research context: Thirty-four nursing students of a Cyprus University participated in the four focus groups. Each group was homogenous in terms of the year of study and heterogeneous in terms of clinical practice in various wards. Ethical consideration: The study’s protocol was reviewed and approved by the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee. Ethical standards were followed throughout the study. Findings: Several factors that maintain or compromise patients’ dignity emerged. These factors were grouped into five themes: (a) patients’ preferences, verbal abuse and regarding a patient as a unique person; (b) privacy and confidentiality; (c) loss of autonomy and need for help; (d) discrimination and (e) attribution and reciprocity. Discussion: Different understandings of the perceived concept of dignity and the factors that maintain or compromise patient’s dignity were expressed through the eyes and the feelings of nursing students. Students highlighted the importance of promoting patient dignity as an important component of nursing care. Conclusion: Nurse educators can use the findings of this study in order to tailor nursing programmes to emphasise the importance of respecting patients’ dignity. In addition, nurse ward managers can use the findings as means for persuading nurses to change current behaviour.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Ethicsen_US
dc.rights© SAGEen_US
dc.subjectDignityen_US
dc.subjectFocus groupsen_US
dc.subjectNursing careen_US
dc.subjectNursing studentsen_US
dc.titleNursing students’ perceptions of patient dignityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Ministry of Healthen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0969733014557136en_US
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume23en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.spage92en_US
dc.identifier.epage103en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1477-0989-
crisitem.journal.publisherSage-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5128-3651-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5056-0220-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
p.e..pdfOpen Access166.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

432
Last Week
1
Last month
9
checked on May 17, 2024

Download(s) 5

1,002
checked on May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.