Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8690
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEconomou, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorPaphiti-Demetriou, I.-
dc.contributor.authorKolokotroni, Ourania-
dc.contributor.authorKouta, Christiana-
dc.contributor.authorLambrinou, Ekaterini-
dc.contributor.authorHadjigeorgiou, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorHadjiona, V.-
dc.contributor.authorTryfonos, F.-
dc.contributor.authorFilippou, E.-
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Nicos-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-22T07:15:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-22T07:15:04Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-05-
dc.identifier.citationThe European Journal of Public Health, 2015, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 208.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464360X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8690-
dc.description.abstractBackground.The rate of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of child’s life as recommended by the WHO remains relatively low even after international and national initiatives for the promotion of breastfeeding. Currently, the only data available from Cyprus are restricted to the first 48 hours from public hospitals even though as many as three quarters of all births are performed in the private sector.Methods. A consecutive sample of 568 mothers who gave birth to a healthy full-term baby during the study period (response rate 70.8%) in all public hospital and 29 (of 35) private clinics on the island completed the 14 item breastfeeding self-efficacy scale – short form and were followed up by telephone in order to estimate the prevalence of breastfeeding at the first, fourth and sixth month after delivery.Results.One in two women in public hospitals had a vaginal delivery, while in the private sector where the rate of vaginal birth did not exceed 37.3%. While initiation of breastfeeding within the first 48 hours was relatively high (85.6% private and 79.9% public sector), exclusive breastfeeding rates did not exceed 24.4% in the public and 17.3% in the private sector. Overall perceived maternal self-efficacy was only moderate at M = 3.38 (SD = 0.89) on a 5-point Likert scale and was lower in first-time mothers and mothers of higher educational attainment. Breastfeeding rates fell sharply even by the first month of birth while by the fourth month only one in three Cypriot mothers were still breastfeeding while only one in ten were exclusively breastfeeding.Conclusion Exclusive breastfeeding in Cyprus appears particularly low even while at the clinic, which causes particular concern and needs further investigation. Together with the fact that breastfeeding self-efficacy was rather low and cesarean rates rank Cyprus amongst the highest places in Europe suggests the pressing need for breastfeeding promotion interventions.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.rights© The Authoren_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBreastfeedingen_US
dc.subjectMothersen_US
dc.subjectCaesarianen_US
dc.subjectHospitalen_US
dc.subjectBabiesen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and continuation of breastfeeding in Cyprus: the BrEaST start in life projecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Breastfeeding Association – ''Gift for Life''en_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckv172.092en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume25en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.spage208en_US
dc.identifier.epage208en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1464-360X-
crisitem.journal.publisherOxford University Press-
crisitem.author.deptCyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0522-4671-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7653-002X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2079-638X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2601-8861-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5834-4207-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6358-8591-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ckv172.092.pdfFulltext74.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

484
Last Week
10
Last month
3
checked on Feb 17, 2025

Download(s)

100
checked on Feb 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons