Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8673
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Eun-Hye-
dc.contributor.authorKyriakidis, Phaedon-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-13T11:46:27Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-13T11:46:27Z-
dc.date.issued2008-10-
dc.identifier.citationGeographical Analysis, 2008, vol. 40, iss. 4, pp. 355–379en_US
dc.identifier.issn15384632-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8673-
dc.description.abstractThis article proposes a geostatistical solution for area-to-point spatial prediction(downscaling) taking into account boundary effects. Such effects are often poorly con-sidered in downscaling, even though they often have significant impact on the results.The geostatistical approach proposed in this article considers two types of boundaryconditions (BC), that is, a Dirichlet-type condition and a Neumann-type condition,while satisfying several critical issues in downscaling: the coherence of predictions,the explicit consideration of support differences, and the assessment of uncertaintyregarding the point predictions. An updating algorithm is used to reduce the compu-tational cost of area-to-point prediction under a given BC. In a case study, area-to-point prediction under a Dirichlet-type BC and a Neumann-type BC is illustratedusing simulated data, and the resulting predictions and error variances are comparedwith those obtained without considering such conditions.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeographical Analysisen_US
dc.rights© The Ohio State Universityen_US
dc.subjectGeostatistical solutionen_US
dc.subjectBoundary effectsen_US
dc.subjectDownscalingen_US
dc.subjectDirichlet-type conditionen_US
dc.subjectNeumann-type conditionen_US
dc.titleArea-to-point prediction under boundary conditionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity at Buffaloen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Californiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0016-7363.2008.00734.xen_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume40en_US
cut.common.academicyear2008-2009en_US
dc.identifier.spage355en_US
dc.identifier.epage379en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1538-4632-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4222-8567-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

7
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

7
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

314
Last Week
2
Last month
2
checked on Jan 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.