Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8665
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLegleiter, Carl J.-
dc.contributor.authorKyriakidis, Phaedon-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Richard R.-
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Jonathan M.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-13T11:34:41Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-13T11:34:41Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-
dc.identifier.citationWater Resources Research, 2011, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1-24en_US
dc.identifier.issn19447973-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8665-
dc.description.abstractMany applications in river research and management rely upon two-dimensional (2D) numerical models to characterize flow fields, assess habitat conditions, and evaluate channel stability. Predictions from such models are potentially highly uncertain due to the uncertainty associated with the topographic data provided as input. This study used a spatial stochastic simulation strategy to examine the effects of topographic uncertainty on flow modeling. Many, equally likely bed elevation realizations for a simple meander bend were generated and propagated through a typical 2D model to produce distributions of water-surface elevation, depth, velocity, and boundary shear stress at each node of the model's computational grid. Ensemble summary statistics were used to characterize the uncertainty associated with these predictions and to examine the spatial structure of this uncertainty in relation to channel morphology. Simulations conditioned to different data configurations indicated that model predictions became increasingly uncertain as the spacing between surveyed cross sections increased. Model sensitivity to topographic uncertainty was greater for base flow conditions than for a higher, subbankfull flow (75% of bankfull discharge). The degree of sensitivity also varied spatially throughout the bend, with the greatest uncertainty occurring over the point bar where the flow field was influenced by topographic steering effects. Uncertain topography can therefore introduce significant uncertainty to analyses of habitat suitability and bed mobility based on flow model output. In the presence of such uncertainty, the results of these studies are most appropriately represented in probabilistic terms using distributions of model predictions derived from a series of topographic realizations.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWater Resources Researchen_US
dc.rights© American Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.subjectRiveren_US
dc.subjectRiffleen_US
dc.subjectSediment transporten_US
dc.titleEffects of uncertain topographic input data on two-dimensional flow modeling in a gravel-bed riveren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Wyomingen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Californiaen_US
dc.collaborationGeomorphology and Sediment Transport Laboratory, U.S. Geological Surveyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2010WR009618en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume47en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage24en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4222-8567-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1944-7973-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

67
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

60
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

310
Last Week
1
Last month
6
checked on Jun 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.