Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8519
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPapastavrou, Evridiki-
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorTsangari, Haritini-
dc.contributor.authorKarlou, Chryssoula-
dc.contributor.authorPatiraki, Elisabeth-
dc.contributor.authorJarosova, Darja-
dc.contributor.authorMerkouris, Anastasios-
dc.contributor.authorBalogh, Zoltan-
dc.contributor.authorSuhonen, Riitta-
dc.contributor.otherΠαπασταύρου, Ευριδίκη-
dc.contributor.otherΜερκούρης, Αναστάσιος-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-19T09:42:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-19T09:42:31Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 2016, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 26–36en_US
dc.identifier.issn14716712-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8519-
dc.descriptionThe Ministry of Health of Cyprus (approval no: Y.Y. 5.14.02.4(2)) and the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee (approval no: EEBK/EΠ/2008/1) reviewed and approved the research protocol as Cyprus was the coordinating country for the research study.en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract BACKGROUND: Patients' decisional control over care is the ability or power for patients to decide what their involvement will be in healthcare decisions. There is evidence of limited agreement between the perceptions of patients and the perceptions of nurses and/or caregivers with regard to the degree of patient involvement in the planning and performance of their care. AIM: To analyse and compare patients' and nurses' perceptions of patients' decisional control over their own care. METHOD: A multisite cross-sectional comparative survey design was employed. Data were collected from hospitalised surgical inpatients (n = 1315) and their caregivers (n = 960 nurses) in five European countries. The Individualised Care Scale part B was used for collecting data from both the patients and nurses. Ethical standards were followed throughout the study. RESULTS: Significant between-country differences were found between patients and nurses. In all countries, both patients and nurses regarded that decisional control over care had been actualised (ICS-B: M = 3.75-4.47 and 3.48-4.33, respectively), but there were significant differences in their perceptions regarding four of the six items of the decisional control factor of the ICS-B. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that there are disparities between patients' and nurses' perceptions of patient involvement in care, probably due to cultural issues that need further exploration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The disparities between patients' and nurses' perceptions on patients' decisional control over their care should be taken into consideration as a potential cause of patient dissatisfaction with nursing care.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was funded by the Cyprus University of Technology (EX 11/2008).en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciencesen_US
dc.rights© Wileyen_US
dc.subjectDecisional controlen_US
dc.subjectIndividualised careen_US
dc.subjectMulticountry surveyen_US
dc.subjectNursesen_US
dc.subjectPatientsen_US
dc.titlePatients' decisional control over care: a cross-national comparison from both the patients' and nurses' points of viewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.linkhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/scs.12218/abstracten_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Ministry of Healthen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Nicosiaen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Ostravaen_US
dc.collaborationSemmelweis Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turkuen_US
dc.subject.categoryBasic Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCzech Republicen_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/scs.12218en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume30en_US
cut.common.academicyear2014-2015en_US
dc.identifier.spage26en_US
dc.identifier.epage36en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1471-6712-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5128-3651-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8515-007X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

12
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

387
Last Week
4
Last month
9
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.